State Of Louisiana v. Doc Warren

Supreme Court of Louisiana
June 12, 2020
Clerk of Court
For the Court
The Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana
STATE OF LOUISIANA VS.
DOC WARREN
No.2019-KH-01898
_ _
_ _ _ _
I
N RE: Doc Warren - Applicant Defendant; Applying For Supervisory Writ, Parish
of Orleans Criminal, Criminal District Court Number(s) 529-261, Court of Appeal,
Fourth Circuit, Number(s) 2019-K-0844;
_ _ _ _ _ _
June 12, 2020
Writ application denied. See per curiam.
WJC
BJJ
JLW
JDH
SJC
JTG
JHB
06/12/2020 "See News Release 021 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents."

06/12/20
S
UPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
No
. 19-KH-1898
S
TATE OF LOUISIANA
v.
DO
C WARREN
O
N SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CRIMINAL
DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS
PE
R CURIAM:
D
enied. Applicant fails to show that he was denied the effective assistance
of counsel during plea negotiations under the standard of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). As to his remaining claims,
applicant fails to satisfy his post-conviction burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2.
Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in
state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-
conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application
only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within
the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in
2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against
successive filings mandatory. Applicant’s claims have now been fully litigated in
accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can
show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive
application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The
district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.