In Re: Appeal of Derek Burns
In Re: Appeal of Derek Burns, No. 2019CW0280 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. July 29, 2019).
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
IN RE: APPEAL OF DEREK BURNS NO. 2019 CW 0280
JUL 2 9 2019
In Re: City of Baton Rouge Police Department, applying for
supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District Court,
Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 664937.
BEFORE: GUIDRY, MCCLENDON, HIGGINBOTHAM, CHUTZ, AND LANIER, JJ.
WRIT GRANTED WITH ORDER. Neither La. R. S. 33: 2501 nor
Rules VI or VIII of the Baton Rouge Municipal Fire and Police
Civil Service Board Rules mandate that the testimony taken or
the proceedings before the Baton Rouge Municipal Fire and Police
Civil Service Board be transcribed. The record in this case is
not rendered incomplete or in violation of La. Const. art. I, §
19 due to the lack of a transcript or an audio recording.
Because neither party requested that the proceedings be
transcribed nor furnished a court reporter for the purpose of
obtaining a transcript, a transcript was not required in this
case. La. R. S. 33: 2501( E)( 3); Rule VIII, Section 1, Baton Rouge
Municipal Fire and Police Civil Service Board Rules.
Accordingly, we find that the district court' s February 27, 2019
ruling permitting a full remand was in error and said ruling is
hereby vacated. However, La. R. S. 33: 2501 and Rules VI and VIII
of the Baton Rouge Municipal Fire and Police Civil Service Board
Rules require written findings of fact be issued by the Baton
Rouge Municipal Fire and Police Civil Service Board when no
transcript is made. To the extent that the record before the
district court lacks written findings of fact, this matter is
remanded to the district court with an order to have the Baton
Rouge Municipal Fire and Police Civil Service Board supplement
the record in this case with the written findings of fact.
JMG
PMC
WIL
Higginbotham and Chutz, JJ., dissent and would deny the
writ.
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
D CLERK OF COURT
FOR THE COURT