Eddie Lee, as the surviving spouse of the Katie Kalisha Lee, and Bertie Weary, Sharon Weary, Sandra R. Weary, Giovanni Lee and Leon Lee, Jr., as the surviving children of the Katie Kalisha Lee v. Ravi Kanagala, MD, Marilyn E. Pelias, MD, and Lakeview Medical Center, LLC d/b/a lakeview Regional Medical Center
Eddie Lee, as the surviving spouse of the Katie Kalisha Lee, and Bertie Weary, Sharon Weary, Sandra R. Weary, Giovanni Lee and Leon Lee, Jr., as the surviving children of the Katie Kalisha Lee v. Ravi Kanagala, MD, Marilyn E. Pelias, MD, and Lakeview Medical Center, LLC d/b/a lakeview Regional Medical Center, No. 2019CW0487 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. Aug. 5, 2019).
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
EDDIE LEE, AS THE SURVIVING NO. 2019 CW 0487
SPOUSE OF THE DECEASED, KATIE
KALISHA LEE, AND BERTIE WEARY,
SHARON WEARY, SANDRA R. WEARY,
GIOVANNI LEE, AND LEON LEE, JR.,
AS THE SURVIVING CHILDREN OF THE
DECEASED, KATIE KALISHA LEE
VERSUS
RAVI KANAGALA, MD, MARILYN E.
PELIAS, MD, AND LAKEVIEW MEDICAL
CENTER, LLC D/ B/ A LAKEVIEW
AUG 05 2019
REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
In Re: Marilyn E. Pelias, M. D., for
applying supervisory
writs, 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St.
Tammany, No. 2013- 15445.
BEFORE: MCDONALD, THERIOT, AND CHUTZ, JJ.
WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Relator has failed to with
comply
Rule 4- 5( C)( 8), Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, in
that the writ application does not contain a of the
copy
pleading on which the ruling was founded, i. e., the exception of
prescription. Further, this writ application does not contain a
copy of any opposition and thereto filed
any attachments by
respondent in the trial court, or a statement by relator that no
opposing documentation was filed as required by Rule 4- 5( C)( 9)
of the Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal.
Additionally, the writ application does not contain a copy of
the pertinent court minutes as required by Rule 4- 5( C)( 10) of
the Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal. This court is
unable to address the merits of relator' s writ application
because it cannot be determined what, if any, evidence was
admitted at the hearing.
Supplementation of this writ application and/ or an
application for rehearing will not be considered. Uniform Rules
of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 4- 9 and 2- 18. 7. In the
event relator seeks to file a new application with this court,
it must contain all pertinent documentation and must comply with
Rule 2- 12. 2 of the Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal.
Any new application must be filed on or before August 19, 2019,
and must contain a copy of this ruling.
imm
MRT
WRC
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
DEPUTY CLEC K OF COURT
FOR THE COURT