Claude Douglas v. The Board of Supervisors for the University of Louisiana System
Claude Douglas v. The Board of Supervisors for the University of Louisiana System, No. 2019CW0876 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. Jan. 14, 2020).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Mbarika v. Board of Supervisors 992 So. 2d 551
- Critton v. STATE EX REL. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT 992 So. 2d 1019
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
CLAUDE DOUGLAS NC. 2019 CW 0876
VERSUS
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FOR
THE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA JAN 14 2020
SYSTEM
In Re: The Board of Supervisors for the University of
Louisiana System, applying for supervisory writs, 19th
Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge,
No. 644910.
BEFORE: MCDONALD, THERIOT, AND CHUTZ, JJ.
WRIT GRANTED. Even assuming that the plaintiff, Claude
Douglas, has made a prima facie case of retaliation under the
burden
shifting framework established in McDonnell Douglas Corp.
v. Green, 411 U. S. 792, 802- 04, 93 S. Ct. 1817, 1824- 25, 36
L. Ed. 2d 668 ( 1973), we find that he failed to meet his burden of
raising a genuine issue of material fact showing that the non -
retaliatory reason given by the relator, the Board of
Supervisors for the University of Louisiana System, for Douglas'
termination was in fact pretext for the real retaliatory
purpose. See Mbarika v. Board Louisiana State
of Sup' rs of
University, 2007- 1136 ( La. App. lst Cir. 6/ 6/ 08), 992 So. 2d 551,
562- 63, writ denied, 2008- 1490 ( La. 10/ 3/ 08), 992 So. 2d 1019.
Accordingly, the trial court' s May 13, 2019 judgment denying the
relator' s motion for summary judgment as to Douglas' retaliation
claims is reversed, the motion for judgment is
summary granted
as to those claims, and Douglas' claims that he was
unlawfully
terminated based on retaliation are dismissed with prejudice.
JMM
MRT
WRC
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
f
iDEPUTY FOR
CLE
THE
K OF
COURT
COURT