Florida Parishes Bank v. Daniel M. Forrest, Jr. a/k/a Daniel Forest, Jr. and Regina B. Forrest a/k/a Regina Forrest
Florida Parishes Bank v. Daniel M. Forrest, Jr. a/k/a Daniel Forest, Jr. and Regina B. Forrest a/k/a Regina Forrest, No. 2019CW0922 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. Oct. 28, 2019).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- In re Harrier Trust 259 So. 3d 402
- First Bank and Trust v. Duwell 70 So. 3d 15
- Johnson v. Montero 215 So. 3d 479
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OFAPPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
FLORIDA PARISHES BANK NO. 2019 CW 0922
VERSUS
DANIEL M. FORREST, JR. A/ K/ A
DANIEL FORREST, JR. AND
REGINA B. FORREST A/ K/ A
REGINA FORREST
OCT 2 8 2019
In Re: Daniel M. Forrest, Jr. and Regina B. Forrest, applying
for supervisory writs, 21st Judicial District Court,
Parish of St. Helena, No. 23900.
BEFORE: HIGGINBOTHAM, PENZATO, AND LANIER, JJ.
WRIT NOT CONSIDERED IN PART; WRIT GRANTED IN PART WITH
ORDER. The writ application is untimely as to the district
court' s May 22, 2019 ruling denying the request for a
preliminary injunction. An appeal may be taken as a matter of
right from an order or judgment relating to a
preliminary
injunction. La. Code Civ. P. arts. 3612 ( B) & 2752 ( A) . Such an
appeal must be taken within fifteen days from the date of the
order or judgment at issue. La. Code Civ. P. art. 3612 ( C) . If
a party elects to seek review by applying for supervisory writs,
it must be done within the same time limits allowed for an
appeal of the judgment complained of, which is fifteen days
under La. Code Civ. P. art. 3612. In re Harrier Trust, 2018- 667
La. App. 3d Cir. 10/ 17/ 18), 259 So. 3d 402, 408, citing First
Bank and Trust v. Duwell, 2011- 0104 ( La. App. 4th Cir. 5/ 18/ 11),
70 So. 3d 15, 17 n. 5; see also Johnson v. Montero, 2017- 0274 ( La.
App. 4th Cir. 3/ 29/ 17), 215 So. 3d 479, 481. Though the
Relators, Daniel M. Forrest, Jr. and Regina B. Forrest, chose to
seek supervisory review rather than an appeal, the notice of
intent was not submitted within fifteen days per La. Code Civ.
P. art. 3612, and therefore is untimely.
However, the district court' s June 13, 2019 judgment
granting the Motion to Forfeit Bond is vacated. A motion should
be tried contradictorily with the adverse if the
party order
applied for is one to which the mover is not entitled
clearly
and for which proof is required. La. Code Civ. P. art. 963.
Therefore, this matter is remanded to the district court with
instruction to conduct
contradictory hearing on the Motion to
a
Forfeit Bond filed by The First, A National Banking Association,
successor by merger to Florida Parishes Bank.
TMH
AHP
WIL
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
OUL
E UTY CLERK OF COURT
FOR THE COURT