Kristen Leigh Viator v. James Patrick Dunphy
Kristen Leigh Viator v. James Patrick Dunphy, No. 2019CW1016 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. Aug. 5, 2019).
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
KRISTEN LEIGH VIATOR NO. 2019 CW 1016
VERSUS
JAMES PATRICK DUNPHY AUGUST 05, 2019
In Re: James Patrick Dunphy, applying for supervisory writs,
Family Court Judicial District Court, Parish of East
Baton Rouge, No. 215621.
BEFORE: McDONALD, THERIOT, AND CHUTZ, JJ.
STAY DENIED; WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Relator failed to
provide a copy of the judgment, order, or ruling complained of
if by written judgment, order, or ruling); a copy of the
judge' s reasons for judgment, order, or ruling ( if written); a
copy of each pleading on which the judgment, order, or ruling
was founded, including the petition( s) in civil cases and the
indictment or the bill of information in criminal cases; a copy
of any opposition and any attachments thereto filed by a party
in the trial court or a statement by the relator that no
opposing written document was filed; a copy of pertinent court
minutes; the notice of intent and return date order required by
Rules 4- 2 and 4- 3; and a separate page entitled " REQUEST FOR
EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION" and indexed as such shall be included
if the applicant seeks expedited relief or a stay order as
required by Rule 4- 4( B) and a corresponding affidavit as
required by Rule 4- 4( C) in violation of Uniform Rules of
Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rule 4- 5( C) ( 6), ( 7), ( 8), ( 9),
10), ( 11) & ( 12). In addition, relator failed to provide an
index of all items contained therein; a concise statement of the
grounds on which the jurisdiction of the court is invoked; a
concise statement of the case, including the status of the case
at the time the writ application is filed, in order to reflect
any trial dates or hearing dates that are
pending; the issues
and questions of law presented for determination by the court;
and the assignments or specifications of errors and a memorandum
in support of the application, in accordance with Rules 2- 12. 2
and 2- 12. 10, and a prayer for relief ) in violation of Uniform
Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rule 4- 5( C)( 1), ( 2), ( 3),
4) & ( 5) .
Supplementation of this writ application and/ or an
application for rehearing will not be considered. Uniform Rules
of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 2- 18. 7 & 4- 9.
In the event relator seeks to file a new application with
this court, it must contain all pertinent documentation,
including the missing items noted above, and must comply with
Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rule 2- 12. 2. Any
new application must be filed on or before August 16, 2019 and
must contain a copy of this ruling.
JMM
MRT
WRC
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
c
DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT
FOR THE COURT