Linda L. Foley v. Judy L. Davis, Trustee of the Kay F. Enright Separate Property Trust
Linda L. Foley v. Judy L. Davis, Trustee of the Kay F. Enright Separate Property Trust, No. 2019CW1481 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. Mar. 3, 2020).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- In re the Succession of Porche 213 So. 3d 401
- Advanced Leveling & Concrete Solutions v. Lathan Co. 268 So. 3d 1044
- Simon v. Ferguson 274 So. 3d 10
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
LINDA L. FOLEY NO. 2019 CW 1481
VERSUS
JUDY L. DAVIS, TRUSTEE OF
MAR 0 3 2020
THE KAY F. ENRIGHT SEPARATE
PROPERTY TRUST
In Re: Linda L. Foley, applying for supervisory writs, 21st
Judicial District Court, Parish of Tangipahoa, No.
2013- 2470.
BEFORE: McCLENDON, WELCH, AND HOLDRIDGE, JJ.
WRIT DENIED. The judgment at issue appears to be a final
judgment, but it lacks appropriate decretal language. See La.
Code Civ. P. art. 1918; see also Matter of Succession of Porche,
2016- 0538 ( La. App. 1st Cir. 2/ 17/ 17), 213 So. 3d 401, 405- 06.
In order for a judgment to be a final and appealable one, it
must be precise, definite, and certain. It must also contain
decretal language, and it must name the party in favor of whom
the ruling is ordered, the party against whom the ruling is
ordered, and the relief that is expressly granted or denied
without reference to other documents in the record. Advanced
Leveling & Concrete Solutions v. Lathan Company, Inc., 2017- 1250
La. App. 1st Cir. 12/ 20/ 18), 268 So. 3d 1044, 1046 ( en banc).
Once a judgment with appropriate decretal language is issued by
the district court, it will represent a final, appealable
judgment, and Relator will be entitled to file a motion for an
appeal therefrom in accordance with applicable law.
PMC
JEW
Holdridge, J., concurs. A final judgment is one that
determines the merits in whole or in part. La. Code Civ. P.
art. 1841. Although the judgment at issue appears to be a
final, appealable judgment, I am bound to follow precedent from
this court, which holds that a judgment lacking the required
decretal language is not a final, appealable judgment. See,
e. g., Simon v. Ferguson, 2018- 0826 ( La. App, lst Cir. 2/ 28/ 19),
274 So. 3d 10, 14.
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
DEPUTY CLRK OF COURT
FOR THE COURT