Dana Neumann, Individually and on behalf of Joshua Neumann, Justin Neumann and Jesse Neumann v. L&B Transport, L.L.C., Trailer Management International, LLC a/k/a TMI, Inc., Gerardo Arreola, Millennium Transport Unlimited, Inc., The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, ABC Insurance Company, and DEF Insurance Company
Dana Neumann, Individually and on behalf of Joshua Neumann, Justin Neumann and Jesse Neumann v. L&B Transport, L.L.C., Trailer Management International, LLC a/k/a TMI, Inc., Gerardo Arreola, Millennium Transport Unlimited, Inc., The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, ABC Insurance Company, and DEF Insurance Company, No. 2019CW1505 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. Jan. 6, 2020).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
DANA NEUMANN, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON NO. 2019 CW 1505
BEHALF OF JOSHUA NEUMANN, JUSTIN
NEUMANN AND JESSE NEUMANN
VERSUS
L& B TRANSPORT, L. L. C., TRAILER
MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL, LLC A/ K/ A
TMI, INC., GERARDO ARREOLA, MILLENNIUM
TRANSPORT UNLIMITED, INC., THE
INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF JAN D 6 2020
PENNSYLVANIA, ABC INSURANCE COMPANY,
AND DEF INSURANCE COMPANY
In Re: L& B Transport, L. L. C., Trailer Management
International, LLC a/ k/ a TMI, Inc., Gerardo Arreola,
and The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania
and Lexington Insurance Company, applying for
supervisory writs, 22nd Judicial District Court,
Parish of St. Tammany, No. 2014- 13640.
BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C. J., GUIDRY AND BURRIS, 1 JJ.
WRIT DENIED. See Herlitz Construction Co., Inc. v. Hotel
Investors of New Iberia, Inc., 396 So. 2d 878 ( La. 1981) ( per
curiam).
vGW
WJB
Guidry, J., dissents and would grant the writ application.
I would reverse the portion of the district court' s October 30,
2019 judgment granting the Plaintiffs' " Motion in Limine and
Daubert Motion to Exclude Evidence and Opinions Regarding
Alcohol Testing Results" in part. The district court abused its
discretion in excluding the forensic test results and any
reference thereto. Louisiana Revised Statutes 32: 663( C)
provides that issuance of a permit by the Department of Public
Safety and Corrections to a certified laboratory makes all
laboratory forensic test results conducted on a person' s blood,
urine, or other bodily substance by a laboratory " valid under
the provisions of this Part, and admissible and competent
evidence of intoxication in any court of law or administrative
hearing." Evidence of such a permit was introduced at the
hearing. Therefore, I find that the issues presented go to the
weight of the evidence rather than its admissibility and can be
adequately explored through cross- examination.
COUE.::_ APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
JA Did wd
DEPUTY rL R OF COURT
FOR THE COURT
Judge William J. Burris, retired, serving pro tempore by special appointment
of the Louisiana Supreme Court.