State Of Louisiana v. Jabari C. Smith
State Of Louisiana v. Jabari C. Smith, No. 2019KW0774 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. Sept. 17, 2019).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Gedric 741 So. 2d 849
- STATE EX REL. GEDRIC v. State 751 So. 2d 239
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2019 KW 0774
VERSUS
JABARI C. SMITH
S EP 17 2019.
In Re: Jabari C. Smith, applying for supervisory writs, 22nd
Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany, No.
556585- 1.
BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C. J., GUIDRY AND CRAIN, JJ.
WRIT DENIED. A district court has the discretion at the
time of sentencing to extend the time period for a defendant to
file a motion to reconsider sentence. See La. Code Crim. P. art.
881. 1( A). There is no indication that the district court set at
relator' s sentencing a longer period for relator to file a
motion to reconsider sentence. Moreover, a district court has
no authority to amend or modify a sentence in a felony case in
which the defendant has been sentenced to imprisonment at hard
labor after the defendant has begun serving the sentence unless
the court grants a timely filed motion to reconsider sentence.
See La. Code Crim. P. arts. 881( A) & 881. 1( A)( 1). See also State
v. Gedric, 99- 1213 ( La. App. 1st Cir. 6/ 3/ 99), 741 So. 2d 849,
851- 52 ( per curiam), writ denied, 99- 1830 ( La. 11/ 5/ 99), 751
So. 2d 239. Accordingly, the district court did not abuse its
discretion by denying the motion to reconsider sentence.
VGW
JMG
Crain, J., concurs.
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
LLa - DE U Y CLERK
Voa,41
OF COURT
FOR THE COURT