State Of Louisiana v. Anthony Rogers
State Of Louisiana v. Anthony Rogers, No. 2019KW0882 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. July 24, 2019).
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2019 KW 0882
VERSUS
ANTHONY ROGERS
JULY 24, 2019
In Re: Anthony Rogers, applying for supervisory writs, 18th
Judicial District Court, Parish of West Baton Rouge,
No. 180183.
BEFORE: McDONALD, THERIOT, AND CHUTZ, JJ.
WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. This court cannot review
adequately
the trial court' s ruling as counsel failed to include a copy of
the transcripts of the motion to suppress hearings. The writ
application is not properly bound, and counsel failed to include
an affidavit indicating the method of service, verifying the
allegations of the petition, and
noting the addresses and
telephone numbers of opposing counsel and the judge. See
Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rule 4- 5( A) & ( B).
Counsel failed to comply with Uniform Rules 4- 2 4- 3,
and by
failing to include documentation of a timely request for an
extension of the original May 22, 2019 return date. Counsel
also failed to comply with Rule 4- 5( C)( 4), ( 8), ( 9), and ( 10),
by failing to note the issues presented for review, and by
failing to include a copy of the motion at issue herein, the
bill of information, the opposition or a statement that no
opposition was filed, and the pertinent court minutes.
Supplementation of this writ application and/ or an application
for rehearing will not be considered. See Uniform Rules of
Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 2- 18. 7 & 4- 9. This court
takes judicial cognizance that trial is for
presently set the
week of August 19, 2019. In the event counsel elects to file a
new application with this court, the application shall be filed
on or before August 2, 2019, and should with the
comply
requirements of Rule 4- 4 concerning requests for expedited
consideration.
The application should include the missing items
noted above, proof of a
timely request for an extension of the
original return date,
and a copy of this ruling.
imm
MRT
WRC
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
DEPUTY RK OF COURT
FOR THE COURT