State Of Louisiana v. Thomas Fife
State Of Louisiana v. Thomas Fife, No. 2019KW0902 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. Oct. 18, 2019).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. E.J.F. 999 So. 2d 224
- State v. Wright 79 So. 3d 309
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2019 KW 0902
VERSUS
THOMAS FIFE
OCT 182019
In Re: State Of Louisiana, applying for supervisory writs,
19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton
Rouge, No. 11- 14- 0793.
BEFORE: MCCLENDON, WELCH, AND HOLDRIDGE, JJ.
WRIT GRANTED. The trial court' s ruling excluding evidence
of the defendant' s conviction relating to the possession of
pornographic images of children is reversed and this matter is
remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. Because
the defendant is charged with sexual misconduct against a victim
who was under the age of seventeen, the defendant' s conviction
relating to the possession of pornographic images of children is
relevant for the purposes of revealing his lustful disposition
toward children. See La. Code Evid. art. 412. 2( A); State v.
E. J. F., 2008- 674 ( La. App. 3d Cir. 12/ 10/ 08), 999 So. 2d 224,
230- 31. Further, the probative value of this evidence is not
substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice,
confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by
considerations of undue delay, or waste of time. See La. Code
Evid. arts. 403 & 412. 2( A).
PMC
JEW
Holdridge, J., dissents and would deny the writ
application. The trial court did not abuse its " great
gatekeeping discretion" in finding the evidence to be
inadmissible. See State v. Wright, 2011- 0141 ( La. 12/ 6/ 11), 79
So. 3d 309, 317.
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
L a
DEPUTY CLERK OF
U--''
COURT
FOR THE COURT