State Of Louisiana v. Kalipp Lindsey
State Of Louisiana v. Kalipp Lindsey, No. 2019KW0941 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. Sept. 18, 2019).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Kalie 699 So. 2d 879
- State v. SURTAIN 31 So. 3d 1037
- State v. Ducre 604 So. 2d 702
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2019 KW 0941
VERSUS
KALIPP LINDSEY
SEP 18 2019
In Re: State Of Louisiana, applying for supervisory writs,
21st Judicial District Court, Parish of Tangipahoa,
No. 1500764.
BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C. J., GUIDRY AND CRAIN, JJ.
WRIT GRANTED. The district court' s
ruling granting the
motion to suppress is reversed, and this matter is remanded for
further proceedings. An officer may, without a warrant, arrest
a person when the person to be arrested has committed an offense
in his or her presence. La. Code Crim. P. art. 213( A)( 1). The
determination of reasonable grounds for an investigatory stop,
or probable cause for an arrest, does not rest on the officer' s
subjective beliefs or attitudes but turns on a completely
objective evaluation of all of circumstances known to the
officer at the time of his challenged action. State v. Kalie,
96- 2650 ( La. 9/ 19/ 97), 699 So. 2d 879, 880 ( per curiam). Since
the officer had probable cause to arrest the defendant for
criminal trespass, any evidence discovered in plain view or
during a search incident to a lawful arrest was subject to
seizure and admissible at trial. See State v. Surtain, 2009-
1835 ( La. 3/ 16/ 10), 31 So. 3d 1037, 1047; State v. Ducre, 604
So. 2d 702, 707 ( La. App. lst Cir. 1992).
VGW
WJC
Guidry, J., would not consider the writ application. The
State' s request for an extension to the original return date was
filed untimely under Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of
Appeal, Rule 4- 3.
C URT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
vL
EfUtY CLERK OF COURT
FOR THE COURT