State Of Louisiana v. Sedrick Hills

STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2019 KW 1435

VERSUS

SEDRICK HILLS OCTOBER 30, 2019

In Re: Sedrick Hills, applying for writs, 19th
supervisory
Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge,
No. 11- 14- 0792.

BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C. J., GUIDRY AND CRAIN, JJ.

STAY DENIED. WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Counsel failed to
include documentation of a
timely request for a return date.
See Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 4- 2 and

4- 5. Counsel failed to inform this court of the status of the
case, and he failed to
comply with Rule 4- 5( C)( 5),( 6),( 8),( 9),
10) and ( 11), by failing to include the assignments of errors,
a copy of the judgment, a copy of the pleadings on which the
ruling was founded, a copy of the bill of information, any
opposition or a statement that no opposition was filed, the
pertinent court minutes, and the notice of intent and return
date order. Moreover, although it is not a violation of the
Uniform Rules, we note that counsel
failed to include a copy of
a transcript of the proceedings at issue and a of
copy any
exhibits
introduced at the hearing. See City of Baton Rouge v.
Plain, 433 So. 2d 710 ( La.), denied, 464 U. S. 896,
cert, 104
S. Ct. 246, 78 L. Ed. 2d 235 ( 1983). Supplementation of this writ
application and/ or an for
application rehearing will not be
considered. See Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal,
Rules 2- 18. 7 & 4- 9.

VGW
JMG
WJC

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

r t

DEPUTY CL RK OF COURT
FOR THE COURT