Fidelity Bank v. the Succession of Geraldine O. Dowden
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 4th Cir., October 7, 2020
Fidelity Bank v. the Succession of Geraldine O. Dowden, No. 2020-CA-0241 (La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. Jan. 20, 2021).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Levert v. Berthelot 127 La. 1004
Opinion text
FIDELITY BANK * NO. 2020-CA-0241
VERSUS *
COURT OF APPEAL
THE SUCCESSION OF *
GERALDINE O. DOWDEN FOURTH CIRCUIT
*
STATE OF LOUISIANA
*******
APPEAL FROM
CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, ORLEANS PARISH
NO. 2019-01204, DIVISION “N-8”
Honorable Ethel Simms Julien, Judge
******
Judge Dale N. Atkins
******
(Court composed of Judge Paula A. Brown, Judge Tiffany G. Chase, Judge Dale
N. Atkins)
Frank J. DiVittorio
Patrick K. Reso
John D. Miranda
CHEHARDY SHERMAN WILLIAMS MURRAY RECILE STAKELUM &
HAYES
111 North Oak Street, Suite 200
Hammond, LA 70401
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF/APPELLEE
Coreygerard Dowden
7831 Brevard Avenue
New Orleans, LA 70127
APPELLANT
SECOND APPLICATION FOR REHEARING REFUSED
JANUARY 20, 2021
DNA
PAB
TGC
In this executory proceeding, Appellant, Coreygerard Dowden, appealed the
trial court’s July 19, 2019 judgment which denied Appellant’s petition for
preliminary injunction to halt the petition of Appellee, Fidelity Homestead Savings
Bank (“Fidelity”), to seize and sell immovable property to satisfy an unpaid
promissory note and mortgage. In its October 7, 2020 Opinion, this Court
discussed the factual and procedural background of this matter and dismissed the
appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Fidelity Bank v. Succession of Dowden, 2020-
0241, 2020 WL 5939215 (La. App. 4 Cir. 10/7/20). Thereafter, on October 20,
2020, Appellant filed an application for rehearing, which this Court denied on
October 29, 2020. When this Court denied Appellant’s first application for
rehearing, we did not grant Appellant the right to apply for another rehearing,
pursuant to Uniform Rules, Courts of Appeal, Rule 2-18.6.
On December 14, 2020,1 Appellant filed an “Application for Writ of
Supervisory Review,” again seeking reversal of the trial court’s July 19, 2019
judgment. Though styled as a writ application, in substance, the pleading is a
second application for rehearing of his appeal. This Court will not consider a
1
Prior to filing his pleading with this Court, Appellant filed a writ with the Louisiana Supreme
Court on November 30, 2020.
1
repetitive application for rehearing on an appeal that we have already considered
and dismissed. See Levert v. Berthelot, 127 La. 1004, 54 So. 329 (1910) (“A decree
on rehearing being final when rendered, an application for a second rehearing
cannot be entertained, unless the decree contains a reservation for such
application”).
Accordingly, Appellant’s second application for rehearing is refused.
DECREE
For the foregoing reasons, Appellant’s second application for rehearing is
refused.
SECOND APPLICATION FOR REHEARING REFUSED
2