State Of Louisiana v. Alfred Mayo

Supreme Court of Louisiana
November 18, 2020
Clerk of Court
For the Court
The Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana
STATE OF LOUISIANA
VS.
ALFRED MAYO
No.2020-KH-01101
_ _ _ _
_ _
IN R
E: Alfred Mayo - Applicant Defendant; Applying For Supervisory Writ, Parish
of Allen, 33rd Judicial District Court Number(s) 2013-0633, Court of Appeal, Third
Circuit, Number(s) KH 18-00931;
_ _ _ _ _ _
November 18, 2020
Writ application denied. See per curiam.
JDH
BJJ
JLW
SJC
JTG
WJC
JHB
11/18/2020 “See News Release 044 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents.”

11/18/20
S
UPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
No
. 20-KH-1101
S
TATE OF LOUISIANA
v.
AL
FRED MAYO
O
N SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE THIRTY-THIRD
JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ALLEN
PE
R CURIAM:
D
enied. Applicant fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of
counsel under the standard of Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct.
2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).
Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in
state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-
conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application
only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within
the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in
2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against
successive filings mandatory. Applicant’s claims have now been fully litigated in
accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can
show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive
application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The
district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.