State Of Louisiana v. Rosheed Guillory
State Of Louisiana v. Rosheed Guillory, No. 2020-KH-01208 (La. Dec. 8, 2020).
Opinion text
Supreme Court of Louisiana
December 08, 2020
Clerk of Court
For the Court
The Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana
STATE OF LOUISIANA
VS.
ROSHEED GUILLORY
No.2020-KH-01208
_ _ _ _
_ _
IN R
E: Rosheed Guillory - Applicant Defendant; Applying For Supervisory Writ,
Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court Number(s) 2009-CR-125227, Court
of Appeal, Third Circuit, Number(s) KH 19-00333;
_ _ _ _ _ _
December 08, 2020
Writ application denied. See per curiam.
JBM
BJJ
JLW
JDH
SJC
JTG
WJC
12/08/2020 “See News Release 047 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents.”
12/08/20
S
UPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
No
. 20-KH-1208
S
TATE OF LOUISIANA
v.
R
OSHEED GUILLORY
O
N SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE FIFTEENTH
JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF LAFAYETTE
PE
R CURIAM:
D
enied. Applicant fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of
counsel under the standard of Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct.
2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). His remaining claims are repetitive. La.C.Cr.P. art.
930.4.
Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in
state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-
conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application
only under the narrow circumstances pro vided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within
the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in
2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against
successive filings mandatory. Applicant’s claims have now been fully litigated in
accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can
show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive
application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The
district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.