State Of Louisiana v. Corderrius Dashon Mitchell
State Of Louisiana v. Corderrius Dashon Mitchell, No. 2020-KP-01150 (La. May 25, 2021).
Opinion text
Supreme Court of Louisiana
May 25, 2021
Chief Deputy Clerk of Court
For the Court
The Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana
STATE OF LOUISIANA
VS.
CORDERRIUS DASHON MITCHELL
No. 2020-KP-01150
_ _
_ _ _ _
I
N RE: Corderrius Dashon Mitchell - Applicant Defendant; Applying For
Supervisory Writ, Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court
Number(s) 09-14-0338, 1st Circuit Court of Appeal, Number(s) 2020 KW 0569;
_ _ _ _ _ _
May 25, 2021
Writ application denied. See per curiam.
JLW
JDH
SJC
JTG
WJC
JBM
PDG
05/25/2021 "See News Release 023 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents."
05/25/21
S
UPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
No
. 20-KP-1150
S
TATE OF LOUISIANA
v.
CO
RDERRIUS DASHON MITCHELL
O
N SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE NINETEENTH
JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE
PE
R CURIAM:
D
enied. Applicant fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of
counsel under the standard of Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct.
2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). As to his remaining claims, applicant fails to satisfy
his post-conviction burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2.
Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in
state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-
conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application
only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within
the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in
2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against
successive filings mandatory. Applicant’s claims have now been fully litigated in
accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can
show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive
application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The
district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.