Reginald Francis Sr. v. Shentelle L. Daigle and the Hon Bridget Hana, Clerk of Court for the Parish of Ascension

STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL
le
15- --
jl -
FIRST CIRCUIT

Lt v NUMBER 2020 CE 0723

REGINALD FRANCIS SR.

VERSUS

SHENTELLE L. DAIGLE AND THE HON. BRIDGET HANA,
CLERK OF COURT FOR THE PARISH OF ASCENSION

Judgment Rendered:
AUG 1 4 2020

Appealed from the
Twenty -Third Judicial District Court
In and for the Parish of Ascension, Louisiana
Docket Number 129, 328

Honorable Emile St. Pierre, Judge Presiding pro tempore

Charles S. Long Counsel for Plaintiff/Appellee,
C. Spencer Long, II Reginald Francis, Sr.
Baton Rouge, LA

Seth M. Dornier Counsel for Defendant/Appellant,
Baton Rouge, LA Shentelle Daigle
and

Jonathan Holloway
Baton Rouge, LA

BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C. J., GUIDRY, CHUTZ, PENZATO,
AND WOLFE, JJ.

jw I' Uf
C I r C 11`
rr0
[ u._ sl

2020 AUG 14 FM 2' 0
ROOD HAQUIH
CLERK

WOLFE, J.

In this suit challenging candidacy, defendant appeals the district

court' s judgment granting plaintiffs objection to her candidacy and

disqualifying her as a candidate for the office of Council Member, District 3,

City of Donaldsonville. For the following reasons, we dismiss the appeal as

untimely.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On July 22, 2020, Shentelle Louise Daigle filed a sworn Notice of

Candidacy with the Ascension Parish Clerk of Court, declaring her intent to

run for the office of Council Member, District 3, City of Donaldsonville. In

the Notice of Candidacy, Daigle certified that her domicile address was 918

Nolan Avenue, Donaldsonville, Louisiana!

On July 31, 2020, Reginald Francis, Sr. filed an Objection to the

Candidacy of Daigle, contending that Daigle did not meet the residency,

domicile, and voter registration requirements to qualify as a candidate for

the City of Donaldsonville Council, District 3. See La. R.S. 18: 492( A)(3).

The district court conducted a hearing on the matter on August 5,

2020, and subsequently signed a written judgment on Friday, August 7,

2020, disqualifying Daigle as a candidate for Council Member, City of

Donaldsonville, District 3. Seeking review of this judgment, Daigle filed a

Motion for a Devolutive Appeal on August 10, 2020.

On August 12, 2020, this court issued a Rule to Show Cause Order,

ordering the parties to show cause by briefs whether the appeal should or

One of the requirements to qualify as a candidate in a primary election is the
timely filing of a notice of candidacy, which shall be in writing and shall state the
candidate' s name, the office she seeks, the address of her domicile, and the parish, ward
and precinct where she is registered to vote. La. R.S. 18: 461( A)( 1) & 18: 463( A)( 1)( a).

2

should not be dismissed as untimely. Also on that date, Francis filed a

Motion to Dismiss Daigle' s appeal on the basis that it is untimely pursuant

to La. R.S. 18: 1409( D) and 18: 1413. Accordingly, we will first consider the

timeliness of Francis' s appeal.

DISCUSSION

Pursuant to La. R.S. 18: 1409( D), "[ w] ithin twenty-four hours after

rendition ofjudgment, a party aggrieved by the judgment may appeal by

obtaining an order of appeal and giving bond for a sum fixed by the court to

secure the payment of costs." ( Emphasis added). Regarding the meaning of

rendition of judgment," La. R.S. 18: 1409( J) provides that "[ a] s used in this

Chapter, judgment shall be deemed to have been rendered when signed by

the judge." ( Emphasis added).

A party seeking relief under the Election Code must bring himself

within the strict provisions of the law governing election suits. Jackson v.

Myer, 2010- 2108 ( La. App. 1St Cir. 11/ 19/ 10), 52 So. 3d 271, 272. The

legislature in drafting and enacting the Election Code sought to expedite

contests involving candidacy. The short time delays are in the interest of the

electorate, not the private litigants. Jackson, 52 So. 3d at 272.

In the instant case, the district court signed its judgment on August 7,

2020. While La. R.S. 18: 1409( C), requires, in suits objecting to candidacy,

that the district court judge indicate the date and time rendered on the

judgment, the district court' s judgment herein does not indicate the precise

time on August 7, 2020 that it was rendered. Nonetheless, because the

judgment was signed on a Friday, the lack of the precise time of rendition is

not fatal to our determination as to timeliness of the motion for appeal.

3

With regard to contests and challenges filed pursuant to Chapter 9 of

the Election Code, which encompasses challenges to candidacy, La. R.S.

18: 1413 provides as follows:

Computation of all time intervals in this Chapter shall include
Sundays and other legal holidays. However, if the time interval
ends on a Sunday or other legal holiday, then noon of the next
legal day shall be deemed to be the end of the time interval.

Thus, where the time interval ends on a legal holiday, the grace period

provided by La. R.S. 18: 1413 is only until " noon of the next legal day." See

Mudge v. Magee, 98- 2177 ( La. App. 4' Cir. 9/ 10/ 98), 719 So. 2d 534, 535.

Because the twenty-four period following the district court' s rendition of its

August 7, 2020 judgment expired on Saturday, August 8, 2020, Daigle had

until noon on Monday, August 10, 2020, to perfect her appeal. See Lumar v.

Lawson, 20- 251 ( La. App. 5" Cir. 8/ 10/ 20), So. 3d , , 2020 WL

4580734, * 2, & Walker v. Rinicker, 29, 361 ( La. App. 2nd Cir. 9/ 6/ 96), 681

So. 2d 1, 4.

However, the record of appeal demonstrates that Daigle did not file

her Motion for Devolutive Appeal until Monday, August 10, 2020, at 2: 15

p. m. Accordingly, we are compelled to conclude that Daigle' s failure to file

her motion for appeal prior to noon on Monday, August 10, 2020, is fatal to

her case. See Mudge, 719 So 2d at 535, & Bonvillain v. Bonvillain, 02-

01077 ( La. App. 3rd Cir. 9/ 5/ 02), 834 So. 2d 1051, 1051- 1052; also see

generally Brou v. Martin, 2008- 1685 ( La. 7/ 31/ 08), 987 So. 2d 249.

CONCLUSION

For the above and foregoing reasons, Shentelle Daigle' s appeal of the

district court' s August 7, 2020 judgment, disqualifying her as a candidate

11

for Council Member, City of Donaldsonville, District 3, is dismissed.

Considering our ruling in this matter, Francis' s Motion to Dismiss Daigle' s

appeal as untimely is moot.

APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION TO DISMISS MOOT.

5