Alyssa Mascorro v. Peter Schulz, Geico Insurance Company, Cullen Walsh, and USAA Insurance Company
Alyssa Mascorro v. Peter Schulz, Geico Insurance Company, Cullen Walsh, and USAA Insurance Company, No. 2020CW0051 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. Mar. 13, 2020).
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
ALYSSA MASCORRO NO. 2020 CW 0051
VERSUS
PETER SCHULZ, GEICO
INSURANCE COMPANY, CULLEN 7VI
WALSH, AND USAA INSURANCE
COMPANY
In Re: Cullen Walsh and USAA Casualty Insurance Company,
applying for supervisory writs, 22nd Judicial District
Court, Parish of St. Tammany, No. 2014- 12140.
BEFORE: MCDONALD, THERIOT, AND CHUTZ, JJ.
WRIT DENIED.
Jm!
WRC
Theriot, J.,
dissents and would grant the writ finding that
the plaintiff, Alyssa Mascorro, failed to meet her burden of
proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that David
Barczyk' s testimony was based on sufficient facts and data, that
the testimony was the product of reliable principles and
methods, and that he reliably applied the principles and methods
to the facts of this case. See La. Code Evid. art. 702 and
Chatelain v. Akin, No. 15- 5747, 2018 WL 3063118, * 3- 5 ( E. D. La.
2/ 26/ 18).
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
T51
DEPUTY C ERK OF COURT
FOR THE COURT