Whitney Bank v. Henry Rayford
Whitney Bank v. Henry Rayford, No. 2020CW0357 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. July 6, 2020).
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
WHITNEY BANK NO. 2020 CW 0357
VERSUS
HENRY RAYFORD
JULY 06, 2020
In Re: Henry Rayford, for
applying supervisory writs, 22nd
Judicial District Court, Parish of Washington, No.
108044.
BEFORE: MCDONALD, THERIOT, AND CHUTZ, JET.
WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. The writ application fails to comply
with Rules 4- 2, 4-- 3, 4- 4, and 4- 5 of the Uniform Rules of
Louisiana Courts of Appeal, as it does not include a notice of
intent to seek
supervisory review; a return date order; an
affidavit verifying the allegations of the writ application; a
copy of the original petition, responsive documents to Rayford' s
Motion to Strike ( if any), the judgment,
signed and the court
minutes; and a request for expedited consideration as required
by Rule 4- 4( B) & ( C).
Supplementation of this writ application and/ or an
application for rehearing will not be considered. Uniform Rules
of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 4- 9 and 2- 18. 7. In the
event relator seeks to file a new application with this court,
it must contain all pertinent documentation and must comply with
Rule 2- 12. 2 of the Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal.
Any new application must be filed on or before August 7, 2020,
and must contain a copy of this ruling.
JMM
MRT
WRC
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
r"
4k-
DEPUTY CL K OF COURT
FOR THE COURT