2020CW0633 Nonprecedential Writ not considered Processed

Melody Valentin v. Jamarkus D. Moses

Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit · Filed October 26, 2020

Opinion text

STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

MELODY VALENTIN NO. 2020 CW 0633

VERSUS

JAMARKUS D. MOSES OCTOBER 26, 2020

In Re: Jamarkus D. Moses, applying for writs,
supervisory
23rd Judicial District Court, Parish of Ascension, No.
2020- 141.

BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C. J., WELCH AND CHUTZ, JJ.

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Relator' s writ application contains a
number of violations of Rule 4- 5 of the Uniform Rules of

Louisiana Courts of Appeal, namely, the lack of the exception of
prescription filed by respondent, any opposition thereto filed
by relator, and all pertinent court minutes, violations of Rule
4-- 5 ( C) ( 8) ( 9)&( 10) . Moreover, relator failed to file his writ
application within the return date set by the district court, a

violation of Rule 4- 3 of the Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts
of Appeal.

Supplementation of this writ application and/ or application

for rehearing will not be considered. See Uniform Rules of

Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 4- 9 and 2- 18. 7.

In the event relator seeks to file a new application with

this court, it must contain all pertinent documentation, the
missing items noted above, all documents necessary to prove the
timeliness of this application, and must comply with Uniform
Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rule 2- 12. 2. Any new

application must be filed no later than November 30, 2020, and

must contain a copy of this ruling.

VGW
JEW

Chutz, J., dissents and would deny the writ application.

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

i

DEPUTY CLE K OF COURT
FOR THE COURT