Colby S. Harrington v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College and Andrea Carroll

STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

COLBY S. HARRINGTON NO. 2020 CW 1012

VERSUS PAGE 1 OF 2

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY
AND AGRICULTURAL AND DECEMBER 14, 2020
MECHANICAL COLLEGE AND
ANDREA CARROLL

In Re: Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and
Agricultural and Mechanical College and Andrea

Carroll, applying for supervisory writs, 19th Judicial
District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No.
691612.

BEFORE: McDONALD, HIGGINBOTHAM, THERIOT, LANIER AND WOLFE, JJ.

WRIT GRANTED. The provisions defining the nature and scope

of judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act do not
authorize a trial de novo in a reviewing court. Buras v. Board

of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of City of New Orleans, 367
So. 2d 849 ( La. 1979). Although La. R. S. 49: 964( G) makes the
trial court reviewing an administrative decision a factfinder
who weighs the evidence and makes its own conclusions of fact by
a preponderance of the evidence, La. R. S. 49: 964( F) expressly
confines the trial court' s review of the agency decision to its
record, and La. R. S. 49: 964( E) expressly restricts the
submission of additional evidence found material by the court to
that " taken before the agency." Dobrowolski v. Louisiana State
Employees' Retirement System, 2001- 2917 ( La. App. 1st Cir.
2/ 14/ 03), 845 So. 2d 454, 457. Without ruling on whether or not

Mr. Colby S. Harrington' s claims are indeed reviewable under the
Administrative Procedure Act, we find that the trial court erred
in admitting additional evidence de novo, without following the
procedure mandated by La. R. S. 49: 964. Therefore, the writ is
granted and that portion of the trial court' s September 23, 2020
judgment granting relief under the Administrative Procedure Act,
which included the stay of enforcement of the administrative

decision of expulsion, and ordered that defendants, Board of

Supervisors of Louisiana State University and Agricultural and

Mechanical College and Andrea Carroll, review Mr. Colby S.
Harrington' s application for readmission to the Louisiana State
University Law School or conduct a full and fair disciplinary
proceeding, is reversed. We pretermit a decision on the issue of
prescription due to the lack of evidence in this writ

application.

JMM
WIL
EW

Higginbotham, J., concurs in the result.

Theriot, J., concurs in part and • dissents in part. The

grant of authority constitutionally vested in management boards,
such as the Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University
and Agricultural and Mechanical College, precludes the

STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

NO. 2020 CW 1012

PAGE 2 OF 2

application of the Administrative Procedure Act. Grace v. Board
of Trustees for State Colleges and Universities, 442 So. 2d 598
La. App. 1st Cir. 1983), writ denied, 444 So. 2d 1223 ( La.
1984). See also La. Const. art. VIII, § 7. This management board
has authority to adopt rules and regulations governing the
internal management of the universities, including its relation

to students, without legislative consent or approval. Id. at

601. Accordingly, while I agree that this writ should be granted
and the trial court' s September 23, 2020 judgment granting
relief under the Administrative Procedure Act should be
reversed, I dissent from the reasons of the majority and would

dismiss plaintiff' s, Colby S. Harrington, claims under the
Louisiana Administrative Procedure Act, due to its
inapplicability.

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DE U Y CLERK OF COURT
FOR THE COURT