Mary Sue Marioneaux and the Lela Mae Johnson Marioneaux Trust, F/B/O Mary Sue Marioneaux v. Lucien Harry Marion, Sr., Individually and as former trustee of the Lela Mae Johnson Marioneaux Trust, Lucien Harry Marioneaux, Jr., Marioneaux Properties, L.P., HBM Interests, L.L.C., Eighty Acres, L.L.C., and Wallace Lake Marioneaux, L.L.C.
Mary Sue Marioneaux and the Lela Mae Johnson Marioneaux Trust, F/B/O Mary Sue Marioneaux v. Lucien Harry Marion, Sr., Individually and as former trustee of the Lela Mae Johnson Marioneaux Trust, Lucien Harry Marioneaux, Jr., Marioneaux Properties, L.P., HBM Interests, L.L.C., Eighty Acres, L.L.C., and Wallace Lake Marioneaux, L.L.C., No. 2020CW1099 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. Nov. 9, 2020).
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
MARY SUE MARIONEAUX, THE NO. 2020 CW 1099
LELA MAE JOHNSON MARIONEAUX
TRUST, F/ B/ O MARY SUE
MARIONEAUX
VERSUS
LUCIEN HARRY MARIONEAUX,
SR., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS
FORMER TRUSTEE OF THE LELA
MAE JOHNSON MARIONEAUX
TRUST, LUCIEN HARRY
MARIONEAUX, JR., MARIONEAUX
PROPERTIES, L. P., HBM
INTERESTS, L. L. C., EIGHTY
ACRES, L. L. C., AND WALLACE
LAKE MARIONEAUX, L. L. C. NOVEMBER 9, 2020
In Re: Succession of Lucien H. Marioneaux, Sr., Lucien H.
Marioneaux, Jr., Marioneaux Properties, L. P., HBM
Interests, LLC, and Wallace Lake Marioneaux, LLC,
for writs, lst Judicial District
applying supervisory
Court, Parish of Caddo, No. 588685.
BEFORE: McDONALD, HOLDRIDGE, AND PENZATO, JJ.
WRIT GRANTED. The trial court' s October 29, 2020 order is
vacated, and the October 27, 2020 order is reinstated. The
defendants shall post the security required by the October 27,
2020 order within five days from this order. A trial court
retains jurisdiction to consider objections to the form,
and of the appeal bond and permit the
substance sufficiency
thereof. La. Code Civ. P. art. 2088. Any person in
curing
interest to test the sufficiency, solvency of the
wishing
or validity of a bond furnished as security in a
surety,
judicial shall rule the furnishing the
party bond
proceeding
into the trial court in which the proceeding was brought to show
cause the bond should not be decreed insufficient or
why
invalid, and why the order, judgment, writ, mandate, or process
conditioned on the furnishing of security should not be set
aside or dissolved. La. Code Civ. P. art. 5123.
JMM
GH
AHP
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
r
P Y CLERK OF COUR
FOR THE COURT