Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC v. Texas Brine Company, LLC
Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC v. Texas Brine Company, LLC, No. 2020CW1178 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. Jan. 29, 2021).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- 285 So. 3d 1093 not in our corpus
- 277 So. 3d 1180 not in our corpus
- 282 So. 3d 225 not in our corpus
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
FLORIDA GAS TRANSMISSION NO. 2020 CW 1178
COMPANY, LLC
VERSUS
TEXAS BRINE COMPANY, LLC JANUARY 29, 2021
In Re: Occidental Chemical Corporation, OXY USA, Inc., and
Occidental Petroleum Corporation, applying for
supervisory writs, 23rd Judicial District Court,
Parish of Assumption, No. 34316.
BEFORE: THERIOT, WOLFE, AND HESTER, JJ.
WRIT GRANTED. A valid arbitration agreement exists between
Occidental Chemical Corporation and Texas Brine Company, LLC
which gives the arbitration panel the authority to determine
which matters are arbitrable, including claims in tort. See
Pontchartrain v. Texas Brine, 2018- 1249 ( La. App. 1st Cir.
12/ 30/ 20), -- So. 3d --, 2020 WL 770465, and Florida Gas
Transmission Company, LLC v. Texas Brine, LLC, 2018- 0075 c/ w
Pontchartrain Natural Gas System, k/ d/ s Promix, LLC and Acadian
Gas Pipeline System v. Texas Brine Company, LLC, 2018- 0241, c/ w
Crosstex Energy Services, LP; Crosstex LIG, LLC; and Crosstex
Processing Services, LLC v. Texas Brine Company, LLC, 2018- 0796
La. App. 1st Cir. 7/ 1/ 19), 285 So. 3d 1093, 1097 and 1099, writ
denied, 2019- 01124 ( La. 7/ 17/ 19), 277 So. 3d 1180, writ denied,
2019- 01405 ( La. 11/ 12/ 19), 282 So. 3d 225. Therefore, to the
extent the trial court' s October 22, 2020 judgment sought to
maintain jurisdiction . over claims in tort between the
arbitrating parties, the trial court was in error. Accordingly,
this writ application is granted. The October 22, 2020 judgment
maintaining jurisdiction of tort claims between the arbitrating
parties with the trial court is reversed, and Texas Brine
Company, LLC' s motion for partial summary judgment regarding the
non- arbitrability of tort claims is denied.
MRT
EW
CHH
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
an I-- P,
) wk
fXffTy CtIERk O COURT
FOR THE COURT