2020CW1259 Nonprecedential Writ not considered Processed

Victor Simmons v. City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge through the Department of Public Works, and the Baton Rouge Water Works Company

Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit · Filed March 2, 2021

Opinion text

STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

VICTOR SIMMONS NO. 2020 CW 1259

VERSUS

CITY OF BATON ROUGE/ PARISH
OF EAST BATON ROUGE THROUGH
THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC
WORKS, AND THE BATON ROUGE
MARCH 02, 2021
WATER WORKS COMPANY

In Re: The Baton Rouge Water Works Company, applying for

supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District Court,
Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 662845.

BEFORE: GUIDRY, MGCLENDON, AND LANIER, JJ.

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. This writ application fails to comply
with Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 4-
5( C)( 6) and ( 1C). Relator, Baton Rouge Water Works Company,
failed to include a signed copy of the judgment or ruling
complained of or a copy of the pertinent court minutes.

Additionally, the writ application does not contain a transcript
of the
contradictory hearing on relator' s motion for summary
judgment, and the trial court' s reasons for denying the motion
are not otherwise evident from the writ application. See La.
Code Civ. P. art. 966( D)( 4).

Supplementation of this writ application and/ or an

application for rehearing will not be considered. Uniform Rules
of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 4- 9& 2- 18. 7.

In the event relator seeks to file a new application with

this court, it must contain all pertinent documentation, the

missing items noted above, and must comply with Uniform Rules of
Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rule 2-- 12. 2.Any new application
must be filed on or before April 6, 2021 and must contain a copy
of this ruling.

JMG
PMC

WIL

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

i"

E UTY CLER F COURT
FOR THE COURT