State Of Louisiana v. John Benjamin Cowart

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST CIRCUIT

2020 KA 0201

IV, -
JC, wz-
STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

JOHN BENJAMIN COWART

DATE OF JUDGMENT: NOV 0 6 2020

ON APPEAL FROM THE TWENTY-FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
NUMBER 37184, DIVISION D, PARISH OF LIVINGSTON
STATE OF LOUISIANA

HONORABLE WILLIAM J. BURRIS (AD HOC), JUDGE

Scott Perrilloux Counsel for Appellee
District Attorney State of Louisiana
John Gregory Murphy
Serena Birch
Assistant District Attorneys
Livingston, Louisiana

Lieu T. Vo Clark Counsel for Defendant -Appellant
Mandeville, Louisiana John Benjamin Cowart

BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C.J., WELCH, AND CHUTZ, JJ.

Disposition: CONVICTION AND SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED FOR A NEW TRIAL.

CHUTZ, J.

The defendant, John Benjamin Cowart, was charged by grand jury

indictment with second degree murder, a violation of La. R.S. 14; 30. 1. The

defendant pled not guilty and, following a jury trial, was found guilty as charged

by an eleven -to -one verdict. The defendant was sentenced to life imprisonment at

hard labor without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence. The

defendant' s conviction and sentence are vacated, and we remand to the trial court

for a new trial.

ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR

In his sole assignment of error, the defendant argues the non -unanimous jury

verdict violated his Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial, which requires a

unanimous verdict.

We note that the defendant did not object to the verdict or challenge the

constitutionality of the verdict in the trial court below. The general rule is a party

must properly raise constitutional attacks in the trial court, but a recognized

exception to that rule is when a statute has been declared unconstitutional in .

another case. Unwired Telecom Corp. v. Parish of Calcasieu, 2003- 0732 ( La.

1/ 19/ 05), 903 So. 2d 392, 399 n.5 ( on rehearing).

In the recent decision of Ramos v. Louisiana, _ U. S. T,
140 S. Ct. 1390,

1397, 206 L.Ed.2d 583 ( 2020), the United States Supreme Court overruled

Apodaca v. Oregon,' 406 U.S. 404, 92 S. Ct. 1628, 32 L.Ed.2d 184 ( 1972) and held

that the right to a jury trial under the Sixth Amendment of the United States
Constitution, incorporated against the States by way of the Fourteenth Amendment

of the United States Constitution, requires a unanimous verdict to convict a

Oregon' s non -unanimous jury verdict provision of its state constitution was challenged in
Apodaca, 406 U.S. at 412- 13, 92 S. Ct. at 1634. Johnson v. Louisiana, 406 U. S. 356, 92 S. Ct.
upheld Louisiana' s then -existing
1620, 32 L.Ed.2d 152 ( 1972), decided with Apodaca,
constitutional and statutory provisions allowing nine -to -three jury verdicts in criminal cases.

2

defendant of a serious offense. The Ramos Court further noted that its ruling

applied to those defendants convicted of felonies by non -unanimous verdicts

whose cases are still pending on direct appeal. Ramos, 140 S. Ct. at 1406. Thus,

given the Ramos Court' s declaration of the unconstitutionality of non -unanimous

jury verdicts, the defendant may challenge for the first time on appeal his

conviction by a non -unanimous jury verdict rendered pursuant to La. C. Cr.P. art.

782( A).

In the instant matter, the jury polling forms indicate the defendant was

convicted by a non -unanimous eleven -to -one verdict. Accordingly, the defendant' s

conviction and sentence are vacated, and the case is remanded for a new trial.

DECREE

For these reasons and in accordance with Ramos v. Louisiana, _ U.S. _,

140 S. Ct. 1390, 1397, 206 L.Ed.2d 583 ( 2020), we vacate the conviction and

sentence of the defendant, John .Benjamin Cowart, and remand the matter for a new

trial.

CONVICTION AND SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED FOR A
NEW TRIAL.

0