State Of Louisiana v. Jaime L. Eraso

STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2020 KW 1343

VERSUS

JAIME L. ERASO MARCH 15, 2021

In Re: Jaime L. Eraso, for 19th
applying supervisory writs,

Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge,
No. 10- 09- 0034.

BEFORE: McDONALD, HOLDRIDGE, AND PENZATO, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. Relator' s claim that the district court did
not consider his age as a mitigating factor in violation of La.
Code Crim. P. art. 894. 1 does not point to an illegal term in
his sentence. Therefore, his be in
claim may not presented a

motion to correct an illegal sentence. State v. Gedric, 99- 1213
La. App. 1st Cir. 6/ 3/ 99), 741 So. 2d 849, 851- 52 ( per curiam),

writ denied, 99- 1830 ( La. 11/ 5/ 99), 751 So. 2d 239. Furthermore,
a defendant cannot seek review of a sentence imposed in
conformity with a plea agreement forth in
which was set the
record at the time of the plea. See La. Code Crim. P. art.
881. 2 ( A) ( 2) .

JMM
GH
AHP

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT
FOR THE COURT