2021-KH-00157 Precedential Writ application denied. Processed

State Of Louisiana v. Joseph Michael Kurz

Louisiana Supreme Court · Filed March 23, 2021

Opinion text

Supreme Court of Louisiana
March 23, 2021
Chief Deputy Clerk of Court
For the Court
The Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana
STATE OF LOUISIANA
VS.
JOSEPH MICHAEL KURZ
No.2021-KH-00157
_ _
_ _ _ _
I
N RE: Joseph Michael Kurz - Applicant Defendant; Applying For Supervisory
Writ, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Number(s) 325,055, Court of
Appeal, Second Circuit, Number(s) 53,829-KH;
_ _ _ _ _ _
March 23, 2021
Writ application denied. See per curiam.
Griffin, J., would deny on the showing made.
SJC
JLW
JDH
JTG
WJC
JBM
PDG
03/23/2021 "See News Release 011 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents."

03/23/21
S
UPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
No
. 21-KH-0157
S
TATE OF LOUISIANA
v.
J
OSEPH MICHAEL KURZ
O
N SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE FIRST
JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF CADDO
PE
R CURIAM:
D
enied. Applicant fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of
counsel under the standard of Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct.
2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). As to his remaining claims, applicant fails to satisfy
his post-conviction burden of proof. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.2.
Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in
state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-
conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive a pplication
only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within
the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in
2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against
successive filings mandatory. Applicant’s claims have now been fully litigated in
accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can
show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive
application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The
district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.