State Of Louisiana v. Charles Scroggins

Supreme Court of Louisiana
December 21, 2021
Chief Deputy Clerk of Court
For the Court
The Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana
STATE OF LOUISIANA
VS.
CHARLES SCROGGINS
No. 2021-KH-01502
_ _
_ _ _ _
I
N RE: Charles Scroggins - Applicant Defendant; Applying For Supervisory Writ,
Parish of Bossier, 26th Judicial District Court Number(s) 206,299, Court of Appeal,
Second Circuit, Number(s) 54,266-KH;
_ _ _ _ _ _
December 21, 2021
Writ application denied. See per curiam.
SJC
JLW
JDH
JTG
WJC
JBM
PDG
12/21/2021 "See News Release 051 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents."

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
No. 21-KH-1502
STATE OF LOUISIANA
v.
CHARLES SCROGGINS
ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-SIXTH
JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF BOSSIER
PER CURIAM:
Denied. The a pplication was not timely filed in the district court, and
applicant fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art.
930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.
Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in
state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post -
conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application
only under the narrow circumstances provided i n La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within
the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in
2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against
successive filings mandatory. Applicant’s claims have now been fully litigated in
accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can
show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive
application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state coll ateral review. The
district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
12/21/21