State Ex Rel. Darrell J. Robinson v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Angola, Louisiana
Also decided on this docket: La., September 4, 2025; La., June 27, 2025; La., December 13, 2024; La., March 21, 2024; La., January 26, 2024; La., June 26, 2023
State Ex Rel. Darrell J. Robinson v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Angola, Louisiana, No. 2021-KP-00812 (La. Mar. 20, 2025).
Opinion text
Supreme Court of Louisiana
March 20, 2025
Chief Deputy Clerk of Court
For the Court
The Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana
STATE EX REL. DARRELL J. ROBINSON
VS.
DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA
STATE PENITENTIARY, ANGOLA,
LOUISIANA
No. 2021-KP-00812
_ _
_ _ _ _
I
N RE: Darrell James Robinson - Applicant Plaintiff; Applying for Rehearing, Parish
of Rapides, 9th Judicial District Court Number(s) 243,583;
_ _ _ _ _ _
March 20, 2025
Application for rehearing granted - see briefing notice.
JMG
JLW
JDH
WJC
JBM
PDG
JTK
03/20/2025 "See News Release 013 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents."
Supreme Court
STATE OF LOUISIANA
New Orleans
CH
IEF JUSTICE
JOHN L. WEIMER
JUSTICES
WILLIAM J. CRAIN
JOHN MICHAEL GUIDRY
CADE R. COLE
JAY B. MCCALLUM
JEFFERSON HUGHES
PIPER D. GRIFFIN
Six
th District
Fi
rst District
Second District
Third District
Fourth District
Fifth District
Seventh District
VE
RONICA O. KOCLANES
CLERK OF COURT
400 Royal St., Suite 4200
NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130-8102
TE
LEPHONE (504) 310-2300
HOME PAGE http://www.lasc.org
March 20, 2025
2021-KP-00812 STATE EX REL. DARRELL J. ROBINSON VS. DARREL
VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE
PENITENTIARY, ANGOLA, LOUISIANA
MEMORANDUM TO COUNSEL IN CAPTIONED CASE:
Please be advised that the above -captioned matter will be set for oral argument on this
Court's next available docket. A copy of the official docket with the specific date and time
of oral argument will be mailed out.
Applicant's brief is due on or before 3-31-25.
Respondent's brief is due on or before 4-9-25.
Par
ties may choose to resubmit briefs previously filed with this Court.
It is further provided in Rule VII, Section 9 that briefs sent through the mail sh all be
deemed timely filed if mailed on or before the due date. If the brief is received by mail on
the first legal day following the expiration of the delay, there shall be a rebuttable
presumption that it was timely filed. In all cases where the presumpt ion does not apply,
the timeliness of the mailing shall be shown only by an official United States postmark or
by official receipt or certificate from the United States Postal Service, or bona fide
commercial mail services such as Federal Express or United Parcel Service, made at the
time of mailing which indicates the date thereof. Any other date stamp, such as a private
commercial mail meter stamp, or label from an Automated Postal Center, shall not be used
to establish timeliness.
Briefs forwarded by private delivery or courier service shall be deemed timely filed only
if received by the clerk on or before the last day of the delay for filing.
Regards,
Katie Marjanovic
Chief Deputy Clerk of Court
ccs: All Counsel