Jordan Hicks v. State Of Louisiana

Supreme Court of Louisiana
December 06, 2022
Chief Deputy Clerk of Court
For the Court
The Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana
JORDAN HICKS
VS.
STATE OF LOUISIANA
No. 2021-KP-00904
_ _
_ _ _ _
I
N RE: Jordan Hicks - Applicant Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory Writ, Parish
of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Number(s) 13-1904, Court of Appeal, Fifth
Circuit, Number(s) 21-KH-217;
_ _ _ _ _ _
December 06, 2022
Writ application denied. See per curiam.
JDH
JLW
SJC
JTG
WJC
JBM
PDG
12/06/2022 "See News Release 052 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents."

S
UPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
No
. 21-KP-0904
J
ORDAN HICKS
v.
S
TATE OF LOUISIANA
O
N SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-FOURTH
JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF JEFFERSON
PE
R CURIAM:
D
enied. Applicant fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of
counsel under the standard of Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct.
2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). As to his remaining claims, he fails to meet his post-
conviction burden of proof and/or the claims are repetitive. La.C.Cr.P. art.
930.2; La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4.
Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in
state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-
conviction procedure envisions the fili ng of a second or successive application
only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within
the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in
2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against
successive filings mandatory. Applicant’s claims have now been fully litigated in
accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can
show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the fili ng of a successive
application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The
district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
12/06/22