Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Spicuzza v. Ranzino, 73 So. 2d 208.
-
Woods v. Langenbeck
318 So. 2d 134
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
See Spicuzza v. Ranzino, La.App., ; Jones v. Tulsa, La.App., ."
-
Florida Ice MacHine Corp. v. BRANTON INSULATION INC.
290 So. 2d 415
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
[3] Loeb v. Nielson, supra ; Ebert v. Chambers, La.App., ; Norman v. Brown, La.App., ; Spicuzza v. Ranzino, La.App., .
-
Maloney v. Oak Builders, Inc.
224 So. 2d 161
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
[4] Loeb v. Neilson, La.App., (1961); Ebert v. Chambers, La.App., (1956); Norman v. Brown, La.App., (1955); Spicuzza v. Ranzino, La.App., (1954).
- Delta Paving Company v. Woolridge 209 So. 2d 581 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
-
Gross v. Breaux
144 So. 2d 763
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
See Spicuzza v. Ranzino, La.App., ; Jones v. Tusa, La.App., .
-
Schull v. Guillot
142 So. 2d 487
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
App., ; Spicuzza v. Ranzino, La.App., ; Home Services v. Marvin, La.App., .
-
Airco Refrigeration Service, Inc. v. Fink
134 So. 2d 880
La. 1961
App., ; Brandin Slate Co. v. Bannister, La.App., ; Poche v. Landry, La.App., ; D’Avy v. Briley, La.App., ; Spicuzza v. Ranzino, La.App., ; Baker v. Stamps, La.App., ; Norman v. Brown, La.App., ; Jones v. Tusa, La.App., ; Jack v. Henry, La.App., 128 So.
-
Loeb v. Neilson
128 So. 2d 447
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
Ebert v. Chambers, La.App., ; Norman v. Brown, La.App., ; Spicuzza v. Ranzino, La.App., .
-
Airco Refrigeration Service, Inc. v. Fink
127 So. 2d 290
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Oil Burner & Heating Co. v. Palmer, La.App., ; Moore v. Usrey & Usrey, La.App., ; *292 ; Spicuzza v. Ranzino, La.App., .
-
Bart Construction Co. v. Bailey
125 So. 2d 51
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
Orl., ; Home Services v. Marvin, La.App.
-
Engle v. Hardouin
119 So. 2d 510
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
1954, ; Ducore v. Gross, La.App.1959, ; Spicuzza v. Ranzino, La.App.1954, .
-
Ducore v. Gross
110 So. 2d 752
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1959
In Spicuzza v. Ranzino, La.App., , in which a writ of certiorari was denied, we said: The jurisprudence is well settled in this State that a contractor may recover the value of the work done by him if a price has been agreed upon even though it he unfinished or defective, the remedy of the owner being a reduction of the contract price by an amount ne
-
Jones v. Tusa
100 So. 2d 799
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Spicuzza v. Ranzino, La.App., ; Brandin Slate Co. v. Bannister, La.App., ; Merrill v. Harang, La.App., 198 So.