Mandy Dardar v. Gary Dardar
Mandy Dardar v. Gary Dardar, No. 2021CW0424 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. June 7, 2021).
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
MANDY TROSCLAIR DARDAR NO. 2021 CW 0424
VERSUS
GARY DARDAR JUNE 7, 2021
In Re: Mandy Trosclair Dardar, applying for supervisory
writs, 32nd Judicial District Court, Parish of
Terrebonne, No. 177689.
BEFORE: WELCH, CHUTZ, AND HESTER, JJ.
WRIT GRANTED. The district court' s April 19, 2021 ruling
ordering Jerri Smitko to produce a copy of the client file of
Timothy Dardar to defendant herein is vacated. Neither a
subpoena nor a court order shall be issued to a lawyer to appear
or testify in any civil proceeding, including pretrial
discovery, where the purpose of the subpoena or order is to ask
the lawyer to reveal information about a client or former client
obtained in the course of representing the client unless, after
a contradictory hearing, it has been determined that the
information sought is not protected from disclosure by any
applicable privilege or work product rule. La. Code Evid. art.
508( A). The determination that a lawyer -client privilege is
not applicable to the testimony shall not bind the client or
former client unless the client or former client was given
notice of the time, place,and substance of the hearing and had
an opportunity to fully participate in that hearing. La. Code
Evid. art. 508( C). It appears that the hearing held herein on
defendant' s motion to produce failed to comply with the
requirements of La. Code Evid. art. 508( C).
JEW
WRC
CHH
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
r_
DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT
FOR THE COURT