Christopher Bittola and Danna Bittola, Individually and on behalf of their minor child, Alexander Bittola v. Nekita Harmon, Old Republic Insurance Company, Gelco Corporation and 3M Company
Christopher Bittola and Danna Bittola, Individually and on behalf of their minor child, Alexander Bittola v. Nekita Harmon, Old Republic Insurance Company, Gelco Corporation and 3M Company, No. 2021CW0743 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. Oct. 1, 2021).
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
CHRISTOPHER BITTOLA AND NO. 2021 CW 0743
DANNA BITTOLA, INDIVIDUALLY
AND ON BEHALF OF THEIR MINOR
CHILD, ALEXANDER BITTOLA
VERSUS
NEKITA HARMON, OLD REPUBLIC OCTOBER 1, 2021
INSURANCE COMPANY, GELCO
CORPORATION AND 3M COMPANY
In Re: Christopher Bittola, applying for supervisory writs,
22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany,
No. 2018- 10797.
BEFORE: McCLENDON, WELCH, AND THERIOT, JJ.
WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. The writ application does not include
a copy of the petition for damages and the motion in limine,
memoranda in support, and attachments filed by Danna Bittola and
adopted by relator in the motion in limine at issue in this
writ. Further, the writ does not include a minute entry from
the May 27, 2021 contradictory hearing on the motion. See
Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rule 4- 5( C)( 8) and
10).
Additionally, though not required by the Uniform Rules, a
copy of the transcript from the hearing on the motion is needed
to enable this court to fully consider the merits of the writ
application and to determine what evidence, if any, was admitted
at the hearing.
Supplementation of this writ application and/ or an
application for rehearing will not be considered. Uniform Rules
of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 2- 18. 7 & 4- 9.
In the event relator seeks to file a new application with
this court, it must contain all pertinent documentation and must
comply with Rule 2- 12. 2 of the Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts
of Appeal. Any new application must be filed on or before
October 30, 2021 and must contain a copy of this ruling.
PMC
JEW
MRT
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
DEPUTY
R.' LEAK
6L
OF COURT
FOR THE COURT