Firefighters' Retirement System v. Warren Reed Holloway
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., December 22, 2021
Firefighters' Retirement System v. Warren Reed Holloway, No. 2021CW0925 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. Oct. 25, 2021).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Onstott v. Certified Capital Corp. 950 So. 2d 744
- Boudreaux v. Jeff 884 So. 2d 665
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
FIREFIGHTERS' RETIREMENT NO. 2021 CW 0925
SYSTEM
VERSUS
WARREN REED HOLLOWAY OCTOBER 25, 2021
In Re: Warren Reed Holloway, applying for supervisory writs,
19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton
Rouge, No. 642604.
BEFORE: McCLENDON, WELCH, AND THERIOT, JJ.
WRIT GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The portion
of the district court' s January 21, 2021 judgment denying
the peremptory exceptions of prescription filed by the
defendant, Warren Reed Holloway, regarding the recovery of
overpaid benefits made before September 28, 2005, are
reversed. A petition may assert a set of circumstances
that give rise to more than one cause of action with
different prescriptive periods, and further, when damage is
caused by a contractual
relationship, it is possible that
the petitioner has two remedies, one in tort and one in
contract. See Onstott v. Certified Capital Corp., 2005- 2548
La. App. 1st Cir. 11/ 3/ 06), 950 So. 2d 744, 747; Boudreaux
v. Jeff, 2003- 1932 ( La. App. 1st Cir. 9/ 17/ 04), 884 So. 2d
665, 672. Further, where pleadings reveal a factual
connection between the original and amended assertions and
contain sufficient allegations that fair notice was given
to the adverse party of the relief sought, amendments
should be allowed. Newton v. St. Tammany Fire District No.
12, 2020- 0797 ( La. App. 1st Cir. 2/ 19/ 21), 2021 WL 650155,
3( unpublished). The plaintiff, Firefighters' Retirement
System, filed its original petition on September 28, 2015,
and its amended and supplemental petition was filed in
2020. Therefore, because we find that this matter sounds
in both tort and contract, it is subject to a ten- year
prescriptive period under La. Civ. Code art. 3499, and the
amended and supplemental petition relates back to the
original petition. Accordingly, the defendant' s exceptions
of prescription are granted in part, and any claims by the
plaintiff for the recovery of overpaid benefits occurring
before September 28, 2005, are prescribed. However, in all
other respects, the writ application is denied.
JEW
MRT
McClendon, J., Concurs.
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT
FOR THE COURT