Maxine Queyrouze Nicaud v. Harvey Joseph Nicaud, Jr.
Maxine Queyrouze Nicaud v. Harvey Joseph Nicaud, Jr., No. 2021CW1019 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. Oct. 25, 2021).
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
MAXINE QUEYROUZE NICAUD NO. 2021 CW 1019
VERSUS
HARVEY JOSEPH NICAUD, JR. OCTOBER 25, 2021
In Re: Harvey Joseph Nicaud, Jr., applying for supervisory
writs, 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St.
Tammany, No. 2012- 14977.
BEFORE: McCLENDON, WELCH, AND THERIOT, JJ.
WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. This writ application appears to be
untimely as to the district court' s July 13, 2021 judgment,
which denied the Motion to Quash Rule for Examination of
Judgment Debtor filed by defendant/ relator, Joseph
Harvey
Nicaud, Jr. (" Nicaud"). Nicaud timely filed a notice of intent
to seek supervisory review with this court, a return date of
August 12, 2021 was set by the district court, yet Nicaud did
not file the instant writ application until August 23, 2021. As
more than thirty days elapsed between the signing of and notice
of
signing of the judgment on
July 13, 2021, this writ
application appears untimely. See Uniform Rules of Louisiana
Courts of Appeal, Rule 4-- 3; La. Code Civ. P. art. 1914.
Supplementation of this writ application and/ or an
application for rehearing will not be considered. Uniform Rules
of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 2- 18. 7 & 4. 9.
In the event relator seeks to file a new application with
this court, it must contain all pertinent documentation to
establish timeliness and must comply with Rule 2- 1. 2. 2 of the
Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal. Any new application
must be filed on or before November 9, 2021 and must contain a
copy of this ruling.
PMC
JEW
MRT
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
DEPUTY CL RK OF COURT
FOR THE COURT