Maxine Queyrouze Nicaud v. Harvey Joseph Nicaud, Jr.

STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

MAXINE QUEYROUZE NICAUD NO. 2021 CW 1020

VERSUS

HARVEY JOSEPH NICAUD, JR. OCTOBER 21, 2021

In Re: Harvey Joseph Nicaud, Jr., applying for supervisory
writs, 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St.

Tammany, No. 2012- 14977.

BEFORE: McCLENDON, WELCH, AND THERIOT, JJ.

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. The writ application appears to be

untimely. On February 23, 2017, this court found that the
district court' s August 30, 2016, denial of relator' s Rule to

Show Cause Why Judgment Should Not Be Declared Satisfied was an

interlocutory ruling, not subject to an appeal. Though this
court instructed the district court to set a return date for
relator to file an application for supervisory review, it has
now been over five years since the district court' s decision.

Moreover, this writ application fails to comply with

Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rule 4- 5( C)( 8),
9), & ( 10). Defendant/ relator, Harvey Joseph Nicaud, Jr.,

failed to include a copy of the pleadings upon which the ruling
was founded, any opposition thereto filed with the district
court, and a copy of the pertinent court minutes.

Supplementation of this writ application and/ or an

application for rehearing will not be considered. Uniform Rules
of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 2- 18. 7 & 4. 9.

In the event relator seeks to file a new application with

this court, such application must contain all pertinent

documentation, demonstrate the timeliness of such an

application, and comply with Rule 2- 12. 2 of the Uniform Rules of
Louisiana Courts of Appeal. Any new application must be filed on
or before November 9, 2021 and must contain a copy of this

ruling.

PMC
JEW
MRT

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY CLER OF COURT
FOR THE COURT