Elizabeth C. Eure v. Donald C. Eure
Elizabeth C. Eure v. Donald C. Eure, No. 2021CW1061 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. Nov. 5, 2021).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- 280 So. 3d 656 not in our corpus
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
ELIZABETH C. EURE NO. 2021 CW 1061
VERSUS
DONALD C. EURE NOVEMBER 5, 2021
In Re: Donald C. Eure, applying for supervisory writs, 23rd
Judicial District Court, Parish of Ascension, No.
116074.
BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C. J., PENZATO AND HESTER, JJ.
WRIT DENIED.
VGW
CHH
Penzato, J., concurs in part and dissents in part. I find
the trial court erred in its March 24, 2021 judgment denying the
defendant, Donald C. Eure' s, exception of res judicata, because
the plan administrator " qualified" the Domestic Relations Order
on November 4, 2020 pursuant to La. R. S. 9: 2801( B). Therefore,
the Order is a final judgment that cannot be modified. Pembo v.
Pembo, 2017- 1153 ( La. App. lst Cir. 6/ 28119), 280 So. 3d 656,
660- 61. Substantive amendments to judgments can be made only by
consent of the parties or after a party has successfully
litigated a timely application for new trial, an action for
nullity, or a timely appeal. Id. Accordingly, I would reverse
the portion of the trial court' s March 24, 2021 judgment which
denied the exception of res judicata filed by the defendant,
grant the exception of res judicata and dismiss the claims of
plaintiff, Elizabeth Eure, asserted in her rule to modify
domestic reiations order. I would deny as moot the remainder of
the writ as to the exception of unauthorized use of
summary
proceedings.
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
IDEPUTY CLERK OF COURT
FOR THE COURT