Ron S. Macaluso v. First Guaranty Bank
Ron S. Macaluso v. First Guaranty Bank, No. 2021CW1139 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. Dec. 20, 2021).
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
RON S. MACALUSO NO. 2021 CW 1139
VERSUS
FIRST GUARANTY
CONSOLIDATED WITH
FIRST GUARANTY BANK
VERSUS
UNIVERSITY PLACE, L. L. C.,
CROWE INVESTMENTS, L. L. C., DECEMBER 20, 2021
CHEVY' S ON THE AVENUE,
L. L. C., GORDON M. CROWE, JR.
AND RON S. MACALUSO
In Re: First Guaranty Bank, applying for supervisory writs,
21st Judicial District Court, Parish of Tangipahoa,
Nos. 2010- 000157 c/ w 2011- 000201.
BEFORE: WELCH, THERIOT, AND HESTER, JJ.
WRIT GRANTED WITH ORDER. The portion of the trial court` s
July 26, 2021 judgment, which denied in part the Motion for
Partial Summary Judgment filed by the plaintiff, First Guaranty
Bank, is vacated. The plaintiff raised objections to the
evidence submitted by the defendant, Ron S. Macaluso. However,
the trial court failed to rule on the admissibility of all such
evidence. La. Code Civ. P. art. 966( D)( 2) provides that the
court shall specifically state on the record or in writing which
documents, if any, it held to be inadmissible or declined to
consider. This matter is remanded to the trial court for
compliance with La. Code Civ. P. art. 966( D)( 2), and a ruling on
the motion for partial
summary judgment filed by the plaintiff
after determination of any evidentiary issues, pursuant to La.
Code Civ. P. art. 966( C) ( b) ( 4) .
JEW
MRT
CHH
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
l