Ernest Reney, Paul Reney, Patricia Johnson, and Elizabeth Reney v. Shelton Restaurant Group, LLC d/b/a Popeye's Louisiana Kitchen, and Insurance Programs of America, Inc.
Ernest Reney, Paul Reney, Patricia Johnson, and Elizabeth Reney v. Shelton Restaurant Group, LLC d/b/a Popeye's Louisiana Kitchen, and Insurance Programs of America, Inc., No. 2021CW1148 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. Dec. 20, 2021).
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
ERNEST RENEY, PAUL RENEY, NO. 2021 CW 1148
PATRICIA JOHNSON, AND
ELIZABETH RENEY
VERSUS
SHELTON RESTAURANT GROUP, DECEMBER 20, 2021
LLC D/ B/ A POPEYE' S LOUISIANA
KITCHEN, AND INSURANCE
PROGRAMS OF AMERICA, INC.
In Re: Shelton Restaurant Group, LLC d/ b/ a Popeye' s Louisiana
Kitchen, United Specialty Insurance Company, and
Insurance Programs of America, Inc., applying for
supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District Court,
Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 683, 934.
BEFORE: MCCLENDON, WELCH, AND THERIOT, JJ.
WRIT GRANTED WITH ORDER. The trial court' s June 16, 2021
judgment that denied the motion for summary judgment filed by
defendants, Shelton Restaurant LLC d/ b/ a Popeye' s
Group,
Louisiana Kitchen and Insurance Programs of America, Inc., is
vacated. Defendants raised objections to the evidence submitted
by plaintiffs, Ernest Reney, Paul Reney, Patricia Johnson, and
Elizabeth Reney, with their supplemental opposition to
defendants' motion for summary judgment. The trial court failed
to rule on the admissibility of such evidence in accordance with
La. Code Civ. P. art. 966( D)( 2), which provides that the court
shall specifically state on the record or in which
writing
documents, if any, it held to be inadmissible or declined to
consider prior to rendering judgment. This matter is remanded to
the trial court for compliance with La. Code Civ. P. art.
966( D)( 2), and a ruling on defendants' motion for summary
judgment after determination of any evidentiary issues pursuant
to La. Code Civ. P. art. 966 ( C) ( b) ( 4) .
PMC
JEW
MRT
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
DEPUTY L K OF COURT
FOR THE COURT