Douglas Robins v. Mohammad Zohair Pirzadah, M.D.

STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DOUGLAS ROBINS, ET AL NO. 2021 CW 1274

VERSUS PAGE 1 OF 2

MOHAMMAD ZOHAIR PIRZADAH, M. D.,
ET AL

CONSOLIDATED WITH

DOUGLAS ROBINS AND KATHERINE
ROBINS

VERSUS
DECEMBER 20 , 2021
MOHAMMAD ZOHAIR PIRZADAH, M. D.,

AND CHARLES LANE PEARSON, JR.,
M. D.

In Re: Douglas Robins and Katherine Robins, applying for

supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District Court,

Parish of East Baton Rouge, Nos. 642149 c/ w 698066.

BEFORE: McCLENDON, WELCH, AND THERIOT, JJ.

WRIT GRANTED. The trial court' s August 26, 2021 ruling
which disqualified John L. Hammons from serving as counsel

herein is reversed. The burden of proving disqualification of an
attorney or other officer of the court rests on the party making
the challenge. Succession of Armand, 2019- 751 ( La. App. 3rd Cir.
2/ 27/ 20), 297 So. 3d 37, 40, citing Walker v. State, Dept of

Transp. and Development, 2001- 2078, 2001- 2079 ( La. 5/ 14/ 02), 817
So. 2d 57, 60. When a party raises an exception or motion that
must be proven, it
party' s is that burden to present evidence

establishing the claims made therein. Landis Construction Co.,
LLC v. State of Louisiana, 2015- 1167 ( La. App. 1st Cir.

2/ 29/ 16), 199 So. 3d 1, 2. Here, although the parties attached

documents to their motions, these documents were never formally
introduced. Evidence not
properly and officially offered and

introduced cannot be considered, even if it is physically placed
in the record. Denoux v. Vessel Management Services, Inc., 2007-
2143 ( La. 5/ 21/ 08), 983 So. 2d 84, 88. Appellate courts are

courts of record and may not review evidence that is not in the
appellate record, or receive new evidence. Id. Defendants,
Mohammad Zohair Pirzadah, M. D. and Charles Lane Pearson, Jr.,
M. D., failed to meet their burden of proof, and therefore, we

find the trial court erred in granting the motion. The motion to

disqualify counsel is denied.

PMC
JEW

Theriot, J., concurs. A lawyer is not likely to be a

necessary witness when evidence pertaining to each matter to
which he could testify is available from another source. See
Horaist v. Doctor' s Hospital of Opelousas, 255 F. 3d 261, 267
5th Cir. 2001). I find that based on the documents presented

and arguments asserted, defendants, Mohammad Zohair Pirzadah,
M. D. and Charles Lane Pearson, Jr., M. D., will be able to

STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

NO. 2021 CW 1274

PAGE 2 OF 2

support their defense against this nullity action using sources

other than Mr. Hammons' testimony. Therefore, I concur in

granting the writ and reversing the trial court' s August 25,
2021 ruling which disqualified John L. Hammons from serving as

counsel.

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT
FOR THE COURT