2021CW1294 Nonprecedential Writ denied Processed

Todd W. Fanguy and Christy A. Fanguy v. UV Insurance Risk Retention Group, Inc. and Douglas R. Fortune

Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit · Filed February 18, 2022

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

  • 303 So. 3d 1038 not in our corpus

Opinion text

STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

TODD W. FANGUY AND CHRISTY NO. 2021 CW 1294
A. FANGUY

VERSUS

UV INSURANCE RISK RETENTION FEBRUARY 18, 2022
GROUP, INC. AND DOUGLAS R.
FORTUNE

In Re: UV Logistics, LLC, applying for supervisory writs,

32nd Judicial District Court, Parish of Terrebonne,
No. 187229.

BEFORE: McCLENDON, WELCH, AND THERIOT, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. Plaintiffs, Todd W. Fanguy and Christy A.

Fanguy, have not alleged vicarious liability or respondeat

superior in this matter. Defendant, UV Logistic, LLC' s,
gratuitous stipulation did not defeat plaintiffs' allegations of

independent negligence.

N- Di: i

Theriot, J., concurs.

McClendon, J., dissents and would grant the writ

application. A plaintiff cannot maintain direct negligence

claims such as negligent hiring, entrustment, supervision, etc.

against an employer while simultaneously maintaining claims

against the employer for vicarious liability after the employer
has admitted that the employee was in the course and scope of

employment at the time of the alleged conduct. Wheeler V.

United States Fire Insurance Company, 2018- 1422 ( La. App. 1st
Cir. 6/ 13/ 19), 2019 WL 2612903, * 2( unpublished) ( per curiam);

Elee v. White, 2019- 1633 ( La. App. 1st Cir. 7/ 24/ 20), So. 3d
2020 WL 4251974, * 4, writ denied, 2020- 01048 ( La.
11/ 10/ 20), 303 So. 3d 1038. In this case the plaintiffs, Todd W.

Fanguy and Christy A. Fanguy, alleged that Douglas Fortune was

under the control and direction of UV Logistics, LLC, and that
UV Logistics, LLC was responsible for the actions of Douglas
Fortune under Louisiana law. Defendant, UV Logistics, LLC,
admitted that defendant, Douglas Fortune, was in the course and

scope of employment at the time of the accident. Accordingly, I
would reverse the trial court' s judgment, grant the motion for
summary judgment filed by defendant, UV Logistics, LLC, and

dismiss all claims of independent negligence against UV
Logistics, LLC for negligent hiring, training, supervision and

retention.

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY NLERK OF COURT
FOR THE COURT