Todd W. Fanguy and Christy A. Fanguy v. UV Insurance Risk Retention Group, Inc. and Douglas R. Fortune
Todd W. Fanguy and Christy A. Fanguy v. UV Insurance Risk Retention Group, Inc. and Douglas R. Fortune, No. 2021CW1294 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. Feb. 18, 2022).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- 303 So. 3d 1038 not in our corpus
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
TODD W. FANGUY AND CHRISTY NO. 2021 CW 1294
A. FANGUY
VERSUS
UV INSURANCE RISK RETENTION FEBRUARY 18, 2022
GROUP, INC. AND DOUGLAS R.
FORTUNE
In Re: UV Logistics, LLC, applying for supervisory writs,
32nd Judicial District Court, Parish of Terrebonne,
No. 187229.
BEFORE: McCLENDON, WELCH, AND THERIOT, JJ.
WRIT DENIED. Plaintiffs, Todd W. Fanguy and Christy A.
Fanguy, have not alleged vicarious liability or respondeat
superior in this matter. Defendant, UV Logistic, LLC' s,
gratuitous stipulation did not defeat plaintiffs' allegations of
independent negligence.
N- Di: i
Theriot, J., concurs.
McClendon, J., dissents and would grant the writ
application. A plaintiff cannot maintain direct negligence
claims such as negligent hiring, entrustment, supervision, etc.
against an employer while simultaneously maintaining claims
against the employer for vicarious liability after the employer
has admitted that the employee was in the course and scope of
employment at the time of the alleged conduct. Wheeler V.
United States Fire Insurance Company, 2018- 1422 ( La. App. 1st
Cir. 6/ 13/ 19), 2019 WL 2612903, * 2( unpublished) ( per curiam);
Elee v. White, 2019- 1633 ( La. App. 1st Cir. 7/ 24/ 20), So. 3d
2020 WL 4251974, * 4, writ denied, 2020- 01048 ( La.
11/ 10/ 20), 303 So. 3d 1038. In this case the plaintiffs, Todd W.
Fanguy and Christy A. Fanguy, alleged that Douglas Fortune was
under the control and direction of UV Logistics, LLC, and that
UV Logistics, LLC was responsible for the actions of Douglas
Fortune under Louisiana law. Defendant, UV Logistics, LLC,
admitted that defendant, Douglas Fortune, was in the course and
scope of employment at the time of the accident. Accordingly, I
would reverse the trial court' s judgment, grant the motion for
summary judgment filed by defendant, UV Logistics, LLC, and
dismiss all claims of independent negligence against UV
Logistics, LLC for negligent hiring, training, supervision and
retention.
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
DEPUTY NLERK OF COURT
FOR THE COURT