Charles Branton v. Parish of St. Tammany and St. Tammany Parish Council
Charles Branton v. Parish of St. Tammany and St. Tammany Parish Council, No. 2021CW1295 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. Nov. 18, 2021).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Dutrey v. Plaquemine Manor Nursing Home 205 So. 3d 934
- La. Paddlewheels v. La. Riverboat Gaming 646 So. 2d 885
- Premier Games, Inc. ex rel. Goudeau v. State ex rel. Ieyoub 739 So. 2d 852
- Premier Games, Inc. ex rel. Goudeau v. State 745 So. 2d 15
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
CHARLES BRANTON NO. 2021 CW 1295
VERSUS PAGE 1 OF 2
PARISH OF ST. TAMMANY AND ST.
TAMMANY PARISH COUNCIL
CONSOLIDATED WITH
JOHN G. RAYMOND
VERSUS
NOVEMBER 18, 2021
PARISH OF ST. TAMMANY AND ST.
TAMMANY PARISH COUNCIL
In Re: John G. Raymond, applying for supervisory writs,
22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany,
Nos. 2021- 12864 c/ w 2021- 12868.
BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C. J., GUIDRY, WELCH, HOLDRIDGE, AND CHUTZ, JJ.
WRIT GRANTED. The trial court' s October 20, 2021 judgment
the exception
sustaining of prematurity and dismissing
plaintiff' s, John G. Raymond, claims seeking injunction is
reversed. In the dilatory exception raising the objection of
prematurity, the exceptor bears the initial burden of showing
that an administrative remedy or procedure applies, by reason
of which the lawsuit is premature. Once the existence of an
administrative remedy is established, the burden then shifts
to the plaintiff to show that the specific administrative
remedy or procedure has been exhausted. Dutrey v. Plaquemine
Manor Nursing Home, 2012- 1295 ( La. App. 1st Cir. 6/ 17/ 13), 205
So. 3d 934, 941. We find that defendant, St. Parish,
Tammany
failed to carry its burden of proof. We further find that as
Mr. Raymond' s lawsuit is to enjoin the call of this election
due to the alleged unconstitutionality of the process in which
the election was called and the proposed referendum placed on
the ballot rather than the prospective result of the election,
Mr. Raymond may petition the court for an injunction prior to
the election, the merits of which should be determined prior
to the election. See Louisiana Paddlewheels v. Louisiana
Riverboat Gaming Commission, 94- 2015 ( La. 11/ 30/ 94), 646 So. 2d
885, 888 n. 4; Premier Games, Inc. v. State, 99- 1297 ( La. App.
1st Cir. 6/ 7/ 99), 739 So. 2d 852 ( per curiam), writs denied,
99- 1710, 99- 1679 ( La. 6/ 14/ 99), 745 So. 2d 15, 604, cert.
denied, 528 U. S. 1062, 120 S. Ct. 617, 145 L. Ed. 2d 512 ( 1999).
VGW
JMG
JEW
WRC
Holdridge, J.,
dissents and would deny the writ. If the
vote for the proposition fails, the issue is moot.
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
2021 CW 1295
PAGE 2 OF 2
Accordingly, the constitutionality of the election should not
be tested until after the election. If the proposition passes,
then plaintiff may seek injunctive relief to enjoin the
enforcement of the proposition.
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
1/
DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT
FOR THE COURT