State Of Louisiana v. Livingston Alfred, III
State Of Louisiana v. Livingston Alfred, III, No. 2021KW0507 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. July 6, 2021).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Bourg 196 So. 3d 737
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2021 Kw 0507
VERSUS
LIVINGSTON ALFRED, III JULY 6, 2021
In Re: Livingston Alfred, III, applying for supervisory
writs, 23rd Judicial District Court, Parish of
Ascension, No. 586, 228.
BEFORE: CHUTZ, PENZATO, AND LANIER, JJ.
WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Relator failed to include
documentation of a timely request for an extension of the return
date. See Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rule 4-
3; see also, State v. Bourg, 2016- 0313 ( La. App. 5th Cir.
6/ 29/ 16), 196 So. 3d 737, 741. Moreover, although it is not a
violation of the Uniform relator failed to include a copy
Rules,
of the transcript of the motion to recuse hearing. See City of
Baton Rouge v. Plain, 433 So - 2d 710 ( La.), cert. denied, 464
U. S. 896, 104 S. Ct. 246, 78 L. Ed. 2d 235 ( 1983). Supplementation
of this writ application and/ or an application for rehearing
will not be considered. See Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts
of Appeal, Rules 2- 18. 7 & 4- 9. If relator elects to file a new
writ application with this court, the application shall be filed
on or before August 6, 2021. Any future filing on this issue
should include the entire contents of this application, the
missing item noted above, and a copy of this ruling.
WRC
AEP
WIL
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
C
DEPUTY C ERK OF COURT
FOR THE COURT