State Of Louisiana v. Devin Whitaker

STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2021 KW 0839

VERSUS

DEVIN C. WHITAKER OCTOBER 05, 2021

In Re: State of Louisiana, applying for writs,
supervisory
20th Judicial District Court, Parish of West
Feliciana, Nos. 20-- WFLN- 592, 20- WMSD- 593, 594.

BEFORE: WELCH, THERIOT, AND PENZATO, JJ.

WRIT DENIED IN PART; WRIT GRANTED IN PART. There was no

clear abuse of discretion or error in the granting of the motion
to suppress the marijuana seized from the pocket of the
defendant. See State v. James, 99- 3304 ( La. 12/ 8/ 00), 795 So. 2d
1146, 1150 ( per curiam) (" the officer exceeded the scope of a

valid Terry stop when he removed the canister from [ the
defendant' s] pocket and began manipulating it to determine its
contents. At that point, the officer had embarked on ` the sort
of that
evidentiary search Terry expressly refused to
authorize...."') ( quoting, Minnesota v. Dickerson, 508 U. S. 366,
378, 113 S. Ct. 2130, 2139, 124 L. Ed. 2d 334 ( 1993)). Further,
the inevitable discovery doctrine does not apply to the
marijuana seized from the pocket of the defendant. See State v.
Brock, 2015- 2165 ( La. 2/ 24/ 17), 210 So. 3d 276, 277 n. 1 ( per

curiam) ("[ a] lthough, as the court of appeal reasoned, it is
conceivable that an exception to the warrant requirement could

apply in cases involving pharmacy records, the burden was on the
S] tate to prove that an exception applied to the initial
warrantless search. See La. [ Code Crim. P. art.] 703( D). The
S] tate failed to present such evidence at the suppression
any
hearing and a reopened
evidentiary hearing is unwarranted.").
However, Corporal Nettles testified the defendant consented to a
search of his vehicle after the frisk. The trial court abused

its discretion in suppressing the drug paraphernalia and

methamphetamine found pursuant to the consent search.

JEW
AHP

Theriot, J., dissents in part and would
deny the writ in
its entirety.

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY LERK OF COURT
FOR THE COURT