State Of Louisiana v. Lazarious Dwayne Clayton
State Of Louisiana v. Lazarious Dwayne Clayton, No. 2021KW0912 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. Aug. 12, 2021).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Bruins 407 So. 2d 685
- State v. McCurtis 769 So. 2d 150
- State ex rel. Marts v. State 800 So. 2d 862
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2021 KW 0912
VERSUS
LAZARIOUS DWAYNE CLAYTON AUGUST 12, 2021
In Re: State of Louisiana, applying for supervisory writs,
19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton
Rouge, No. 10- 11- 0195.
BEFORE: McDONALD, LANIER, AND WOLFE, JJ.
WRIT GRANTED. The district court erred in declaring the
defendant' s habitual offender sentence illegal. The conditions
imposed on the sentence are those called for in the reference
statute. State v. Bruins, 407 So. 2d 685, 687 ( La. 1981). The
applicable version of La. R. S. 14: 95. 1 provided that a person
found guilty of the offense " shall be imprisoned at hard labor
for not less than ten nor more than twenty years without the
benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence." Hence,
the reference statute provided for the restriction of benefits
on the entirety of any sentence imposed. See State v. McCurtis,
33, 737 ( La. App. 2d Cir. 9/ 27/ 00), 769 So. 2d 150, 158, writ
granted in part and remanded, 2000- 3080 ( La. 11/ 2/ 01), 800 So. 2d
862. Accordingly, the defendant' s 22 - year habitual offender
sentence, as imposed, should be maintained.
JMM
WIL
EW
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
DEPUT Z, LERK OF COURT
FOR THE COURT