State Of Louisiana v. James Jerrod Spikes, Jr.
State Of Louisiana v. James Jerrod Spikes, Jr., No. 2021KW0998 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. Oct. 18, 2021).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- 286 So. 3d 407 not in our corpus
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2021 KW 0998
VERSUS
JAMES JERROD SPIKES, JR. OCTOBER 18, 2021
In Re: James Jerrod Spikes, Jr., applying for supervisory
writs, 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of
Washington, No. 15- CR4- 128964.
BEFORE: LANIER, WOLFE, AND HESTER, JJ.
WRIT DENIED. Relator' s conviction, habitual offender
adjudication, and sentence became final fourteen days after this
court' s September 15, 2017, opinion on his appeal. See La. Code
Crim. P. art. 922( B) & ( D). Accordingly, unlike the defendant
in State v. Lyles, 2019- 00203 ( La. 10/ 22/ 19), 286 So. 3d 407 ( per
curiam), relator' s case was not pending on direct review when
the amendments to the habitual offender statute became effective
on November 1, 2017. Furthermore, no appeal lies from a judgment
dismissing an application for postconviction relief or otherwise
denying relief. See La. Code Crim. P. art. 930. 6( A).
Therefore, relator' s contention that the finality of his
conviction, habitual offender adjudication, and sentence were
extended by this court' s December 26, 2018 decision on his writ
application ( 2018 KW 1494) is legally and factually without
merit. Relator was adjudicated and sentenced as a habitual
offender under the correct version of the habitual offender law
La. R. S. 15: 529. 1). Therefore, the district court did not err
by denying the motion to correct an illegal sentence.
WIL
EW
CHH
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
D PUTY CLERK OF COURT
FOR THE COURT