State Of Louisiana v. Cedric Emerson
State Of Louisiana v. Cedric Emerson, No. 2021KW1100 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. Nov. 5, 2021).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State of Louisiana v. Reggie Patrick Thibodeaux 236 So. 3d 1253
- State v. Melon 660 So. 2d 466
- State v. Alexander 980 So. 2d 877
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2021 KW 1100
VERSUS
CEDRIC EMERSON NOVEMBER 5, 2021
In Re: Cedric Emerson, applying for supervisory writs, 23rd
Judicial District Court, Parish of Ascension, No.
38, 852.
BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C. J., PENZATO AND HESTER, JJ.
WRIT GRANTED. The district court previously referred
relator' s pro se motions to defense counsel pursuant to State v.
Thibodeaux, 2017- 0705 ( La. 12/ 6/ 17), 236 So. 3d 1253 ( per
curiam). Thus, the matter is now remanded to the district court
to conduct a contradictory hearing. As it appears defense
counsel has failed to respond to the court' s orders, a date
should be set for counsel to file a response. If defense counsel
refuses to adopt relator' s motions, then during the hearing, the
court should evaluate the disruptive potential of the motions in
light of State v. Melon, 95- 2209 ( La. 9/ 22/ 95), 660 So. 2d 466,
before determining whether to conduct a hearing consistent with
State v. Alexander, 2007- 1236 ( La. App. 3d Cir. 4/ 9/ 08), 980
So. 2d 877, as set forth in Thibodeaux.
VGW
AHP
CHH
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
j
1R# 001 , 14 1
T)EPUTYRLERK OF COURT
FOR THE COURT