State Of Louisiana v. Roderick White
State Of Louisiana v. Roderick White, No. 2021KW1417 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. Jan. 11, 2022).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- 309 So. 3d 762 not in our corpus
- 310 So. 3d 1149 not in our corpus
- State v. Cannon 267 So. 3d 585
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2021 KW 1417
VERSUS
RODERICK WHITE JANUARY 11, 2022
In Re: Roderick White, for writs, 19th
applying supervisory
Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge,
No. 01- 16- 0114.
BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C. J., HOLDRIDGE AND PENZATO, JJ.
WRIT DENTED.
VGW
AHP
Holdridge, J., dissents in part. For the reasons more
fully expressed in my dissent in State v. Armentor, 2019- 1267
La. App. 1st Cir. 7/ 31/ 20), 309 So. 3d 762, writ denied, 2020-
01032 ( La. 2/ 17/ 21), 310 So. 3d 1149. T would grant the writ for
the sole purpose of it to the district for
remanding court a
full evidentiary hearing on relator' s claim that he was denied a
fair trial because individuals who were born after June 2, 1993,
were excluded
from participating in the jury venire. See State
v. Cannon, 2019- 590 ( La. 4/ 18/ 19), 267 So. 3d 585, 585- 86 ( per
curiam). In all other I
respects, would deny the writ
application.
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
DEPU4YLERK OF COURT
FOR THE COURT