2022-C-00263 Precedential Writ granted. Processed

Succession Of Willie Clyde Burns

Louisiana Supreme Court · Filed April 26, 2022

Also decided on this docket: La., December 9, 2022

Opinion text

Supreme Court of Louisiana
April 26, 2022
Chief Deputy Clerk of Court
For the Court
The Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana
SUCCESSION OF WILLIE CLYDE BURNS
No. 2022-C-00263
_ _ _ _
_ _
IN R
E: Sharon Burns Woods - Applicant Other; Estelle Green Burns - Applicant
Other; Annie Lee Bradley Burns - Applicant Other; Applying For Writ Of Certiorari,
Parish of Claiborne, 2nd Judicial District Court Number(s) 10,731, Court of Appeal,
Second Circuit, Number(s) 54,168-CA;
_ _ _ _ _ _
April 26, 2022
Writ application granted - see briefing notice and Order.
PDG
JLW
JDH
SJC
JTG
WJC
JBM
04/26/2022 "See News Release 019 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents."

$urul,mume ffimurfi
STATE OF LOUISIANA
New [lrleans
CHIEF JUSTICE
JOHN L. WEIMER
JUSTICES
WILLIAM J. CRAIN
SCOTT J, CRICHTON
JAMES T. GENOVESE
JAY B. MCCALLUM
JEFFERSON D. HUGHES III
PIPER D. GRIFFIN
Sixth District
First District
Second Dislrict
Third District
Fourth District
Fifth District
Seventh District
VERONICA O. KOCLANES
CLERK OF COURT
400 Royal St., Suite 4200
NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130.8102
TELEPHONE (s04) 31 0-2300
HOME PAGE http://www.lasc.org
Api|26,2022
2022-C-00263 SUCCESSION OF WILLIE CLYDE BURNS
NOTE: FOR BRIEFING PURPOSES WRIT GRANTED April26,2022
MEMORANDUM TO COLINSEL IN CAPTIONED CASE
Please be advised that the above-captioned matter will be set for oral argument on this Court's next
available docket. A copy of the official docket with the specific date and time of oral argument will be
mailed out.
Please note Section 8 of Rule VII of the Rules of this Court provides that the applicant or relator. as
the case mav be. must file their briefs on or before Mav 23. 2022: and the respondent on or before
June 10.2022.
Oral argument will be waived if brief is untimely filed. Briefs submitted on legal sized paper should be
fastened at the top. All briefs should be backed with the customary "Blueback" or other flexible material. In
criminal proceedings, the court directs that counsel must file a brief. Failure to do so may subject counsel to
a penalty of contempt of Court.
It is further provided in Rule VII, Section 9 that briefs sent through the mail shall be deemed timely filed if
mailed on or before the due date. If the brief is received by mail on the first legal day following the
expiration of the delay, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that it was timely filed. In all cases where
the presumption does not apply, the timeliness of the mailing shall be shown only by an official United
States postmark or by official receipt or certificate from the United States Postal Service, or bona fide
commercial mail services such as Federal Express or United Parcel Service, made at the time of mailing
which indicates the date thereof. Any other date stamp, such as a private commercial mail meter stamp, or
label from an Automated Postal Center, shall not be used to establish timeliness.
Briefs forwarded by private delivery or courier service shall be deemed timely filed only if received by the
clerk on or before the last day of the delay for filing.
With kindest regards, I remain,
V truly yours,
N Judge
Deputy Clerk
nj: NJ
All Counsel
Hon. Glenn Fallin
Hon. Brian M. Flynn
Hon. Robin Norman Jones
2nd Judicial District Court: 10,737
Court of Appeal, Second Circuit: 54,168-CA
ccs:

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
No.2022-C-00263
SUCCESSION OF WILLIE CLYDE BURNS
On Writ of Certiorari and/or Review
Second Judicial District Court, Parish of Claiborne, No. 10,731;
Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 54,168-CA.
And, whereas, the Court has this date, pursuant to Article 5, Section 5, of the
Constitution of Louisiana, made and issued the following order, to wit- "lt is
ordered that the writ of review issue; that the District Court and the Court of
Appeal send up the record in Duplicate of the case; and that counsel for all parties
be notified."
Now, therefore, the said District Court and the Court of Appeal is hereby
commanded, in the name of the State of Louisiana and of this Honorable Court, to
send up forthwith to this Court, in accordance with Supreme Court Rule l, at the
City of New Orleans, the record in duplicate of the above-entitled case.
Witness the Honorable Justices of the
Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana, on
this 26tr'day of April, in the year of our
Lord, Two Thousand Twenty-Two.
Veronica O. Koclanes
Clerk of Court
Deputy C of Court